Share.

19 Comments

  1. Is there a way to get this for ‘prime age” e.g. 25-54 or is this already that?

    Edit: also not surprised MA is a workhorse.. I feel that M-F.

  2. Some feedback on the data visualization,

    The heat map view is misleading as the values are hovering between 58 – 70 %. Basically you’re showing a shift in color when there’s only a 3 percentage point difference.

    This visually exaggerates differences when a better analysis would show that by and large, states labor force participation rates are quite similar and have a small Range.

  3. Participation vs unemployment stats are mind bending.
    “Alabama’s unemployment rate dropped to 2.9% in August”
    also
    “Alabama’s labor force participation rate dipped to 57.7% in August. The percentage of prime-age workers, those aged 25-54 years, decreased by one-tenth of a percentage point to 78.3%.

    As the number of people searching for jobs reached historic lows, Alabama policymakers have focused on the labor rate and those people – now 42.3% – not participating in the state’s workforce.”
    *tf*

    [https://aldailynews.com/alabama-unemployment-rate-drops-to-2-9-labor-force-participation-dips/](https://aldailynews.com/alabama-unemployment-rate-drops-to-2-9-labor-force-participation-dips/)

  4. Education levels have a big impact on labor participation rates. High school education levels have participation rates around 57% vs ~75% for a bachelors degree.

  5. The_Jousting_Duck on

    I’d like to see the correlation with GDP per capita, I’d imagine it’s a pretty similar map but I’m curious if there’s any outliers