Share.

17 Comments

  1. -Spend 20+ years and 100 Billion dollars to build a rocket that can barely get to the moon
    -Constantly change plans of what the program is supposed to achieve
    -Pick a lander at the last possible point with an unrealistic timeline and ~3% of the budget
    -Be surprised that the lander is delayed

  2. NotAnotherEmpire on

    The orbital refueling project with the dozens of sequential successful launches need to work at least twice to pull this off. Once as a demonstrator, and then the mission itself (which will be scrubbed if the refueling fails). Possibly *two* successful tests if they can’t integrate the unmanned Moon landing into the refuel demo. 

    Starship is very, *very* far from that. 

  3. TimeTravelingChris on

    “Mars by 2018! 100+ tons to orbit!”

    “OH wait, we need a flame trench?”

    “And heat tiles? 50 tons to orbit!”

    “And now we need to seal the tiles? Come on! 35 tons to orbit!”

    “Don’t worry, V3 and V4 will get us to 100+ tons to orbit!”*

    *My need 15 or more refueling launches to get to the moon.

  4. lethalrainbow116 on

    I don’t think anyone believed these dates when I worked HLS. NASA didn’t have enough people to properly assess these missions before the events of this year and they definitely don’t have them now.

  5. Internal_Peace_7986 on

    So what’s the problem? Grandpa skills back during the 60’s out shining today’s kids?

  6. justbrowsinginpeace on

    The whole design was preposterous and only won because SpaceX gave the person who made the award a job.

  7. “NASA safety panel”

    What’s that, probably some radical leftist thing that needs to be removed and replaced with a bunch of patriots. /s

    (the current government probably)

  8. DisillusionedBook on

    Relying on any timelines or any tech feasibility claim coming out of Musk is a ridiculous proposition given the track record. This is what happens when faith is placed in megalomaniac oligarchs with god complexes, penchant for fascism, and a drug habit. You get what you deserve.

  9. No duh, they picked Starship in 2021!! That being said SpaceX is behind relative to their promises to its kinda on both parties here.

  10. Delayed by a few years giving us unprecedented advancements in access to space and tonnage to space. Versus cobbled together from 50 year old programs at 20-100x the cost and delayed by decades already.

    We get it, you don’t like Musk. So a 2-3 year delay is unacceptable, but our previous programs are allowed to be delayed by decades. You know SpaceX will not be the final delaying factor if we stay committed to the SLS and gateway outpost.

  11. It’s not going to be ready for at least 10 years.  If indeed it ever goes to the moon at all.  Requiring a dozen or more launches to fuel up every time is a pretty terrible mission design

  12. This happens when Bezos is allowed to throw a tantrum so hard NASA has to explain the concept of numbers to him because the lander his company made wasn’t chosen because they couldn’t afford it.

    Also, this sort of thing is why it kills me when people claim republicans like space. They’re its greatest enemies.

  13. OldWrangler9033 on

    It possible that Blue Moon may end up being the one used at this rate. The cargo version of the lander will be used sometime early 2026. If that thing can manage to land, then they could just speed up Blue Moon’s development if Starship HLS can’t pull it off.

  14. Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    |Fewer Letters|More Letters|
    |——-|———|—|
    |[HLS](/r/Space/comments/1nm8mps/stub/nfbd22r “Last usage”)|[Human Landing System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program#Human_Landing_System) (Artemis)|
    |[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1nm8mps/stub/nfb99bu “Last usage”)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
    | |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
    |[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1nm8mps/stub/nfb7vkb “Last usage”)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|

    Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.

    —————-
    ^([Thread #11682 for this sub, first seen 20th Sep 2025, 21:35])
    ^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)