The US isn’t the center of the world. Other countries can make a large difference in AI safety.
It wasn’t the USA or the USSR that started the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It was Ireland pushing it forward at the UN. It was South America that showed it was possible to do something like that with the Tlatelolco Treaty.
The same can happen with AI safety. We don’t need to wait for the US federal government.
brakeb on
Global economy… If the US will want to operate in those environments, store data there, they’ll be compliant with local laws and regs…
US companies must comply with GDPR, for example, or data sovereignty, requiring French data to be on servers in France, for example
nabiku on
It’s basic online decorum that if you want to post a paywalled article, you remove the paywall before posting.
Are any of these countries actually building AI themselves?
Aether13 on
Good. As an American I’m totally for these countries forging ahead without us. They just need also be able to stand up to the USA when challenges as well. A global influence is one of the few things that can save our country atp
elodielapirate on
We the American people deserve to be left behind. Good on the world for regulating AI.
itchylol742 on
But can the dangers of unsafe AI be confined within a country’s borders?
benedictwriting on
Whelp, this isn’t true. If 10 children in a fort decide they’re going to build the future of whatever, it doesn’t mean the world will care.
costafilh0 on
Good for the US. Less regulation, more chances for success and progress, and the ability to compete with China and remain relevant in any way in the future.
Now, even less regulation and lower taxes on AI software development and data centers and energy diversification!
9 Comments
The US isn’t the center of the world. Other countries can make a large difference in AI safety.
It wasn’t the USA or the USSR that started the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It was Ireland pushing it forward at the UN. It was South America that showed it was possible to do something like that with the Tlatelolco Treaty.
The same can happen with AI safety. We don’t need to wait for the US federal government.
Global economy… If the US will want to operate in those environments, store data there, they’ll be compliant with local laws and regs…
US companies must comply with GDPR, for example, or data sovereignty, requiring French data to be on servers in France, for example
It’s basic online decorum that if you want to post a paywalled article, you remove the paywall before posting.
https://archive.is/cfCJz
Paywall.
Are any of these countries actually building AI themselves?
Good. As an American I’m totally for these countries forging ahead without us. They just need also be able to stand up to the USA when challenges as well. A global influence is one of the few things that can save our country atp
We the American people deserve to be left behind. Good on the world for regulating AI.
But can the dangers of unsafe AI be confined within a country’s borders?
Whelp, this isn’t true. If 10 children in a fort decide they’re going to build the future of whatever, it doesn’t mean the world will care.
Good for the US. Less regulation, more chances for success and progress, and the ability to compete with China and remain relevant in any way in the future.
Now, even less regulation and lower taxes on AI software development and data centers and energy diversification!