This marks a pretty wild swing in confidence from the administration. It will be interesting to see how the many people who claim SpaceX is the only way forward for American space travel feel about this.
YsoL8 on
And do what?
SpaceX is progressing pretty slowly relative to what everyone expected but any other option is at least 5 to 10 years behind.
mighty__orbot on
I’m going to read this as, “The Trump administration wants more bribes and favors from SpaceX in order to keep funneling taxpayer dollars to them in a pointless race to return to the moon in three years.”
It’s the only interpretation that makes sense.
Financial-Tower-7897 on
Translation: “behind in payments to the regime”
BeerPoweredNonsense on
“He will reopen contracts”… so… more funding for NASA, right? Because the SpaceX bid was by far the cheapest.
Nissir on
If they reopened contracts for every government contract that was behind, the US government would explode.
JapariParkRanger on
If speed of development was the point, they wouldn’t be talking about doing this.
ergzay on
This is just Boeing and Blue Origin lobbyists talking out of Duffy’s mouth. All the more reason we need Jared in his positions ASAP.
SpaceX is always late, but also way faster than anyone else.
CmdrAirdroid on
If getting to the moon is so important then perhaps NASA should have awarded the lander contract years earlier, not as late as 2021 which has now resulted to these delays. NASA spent over a decade throwing money at SLS and Orion but somehow ignored the lander completely.
Decronym on
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|CST|(Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules|
| |Central Standard Time (UTC-6)|
|[HLS](/r/Space/comments/1obk4el/stub/nkh83lz “Last usage”)|[Human Landing System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program#Human_Landing_System) (Artemis)|
|[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1obk4el/stub/nkh89nj “Last usage”)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|
10 Comments
This marks a pretty wild swing in confidence from the administration. It will be interesting to see how the many people who claim SpaceX is the only way forward for American space travel feel about this.
And do what?
SpaceX is progressing pretty slowly relative to what everyone expected but any other option is at least 5 to 10 years behind.
I’m going to read this as, “The Trump administration wants more bribes and favors from SpaceX in order to keep funneling taxpayer dollars to them in a pointless race to return to the moon in three years.”
It’s the only interpretation that makes sense.
Translation: “behind in payments to the regime”
“He will reopen contracts”… so… more funding for NASA, right? Because the SpaceX bid was by far the cheapest.
If they reopened contracts for every government contract that was behind, the US government would explode.
If speed of development was the point, they wouldn’t be talking about doing this.
This is just Boeing and Blue Origin lobbyists talking out of Duffy’s mouth. All the more reason we need Jared in his positions ASAP.
SpaceX is always late, but also way faster than anyone else.
If getting to the moon is so important then perhaps NASA should have awarded the lander contract years earlier, not as late as 2021 which has now resulted to these delays. NASA spent over a decade throwing money at SLS and Orion but somehow ignored the lander completely.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|CST|(Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules|
| |Central Standard Time (UTC-6)|
|[HLS](/r/Space/comments/1obk4el/stub/nkh83lz “Last usage”)|[Human Landing System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program#Human_Landing_System) (Artemis)|
|[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1obk4el/stub/nkh89nj “Last usage”)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|
|Jargon|Definition|
|——-|———|—|
|[Starliner](/r/Space/comments/1obk4el/stub/nkh8om8 “Last usage”)|Boeing commercial crew capsule [CST-100](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_CST-100_Starliner)|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
—————-
^([Thread #11784 for this sub, first seen 20th Oct 2025, 16:39])
^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)