The point reached by justice in Türkiye: Ülker’s 580-page petition about the food detective was passed by the “press and sports” prosecutor in an hour or two and by the judge in 37 minutes.

"We have completed our publications, we thank you for your intense support!

We did our best and made our warnings and announcements to the public before the rich businessman (!), whose conscience was darkened and who made it his motto to destroy everyone in his way for the sake of his business, silenced us completely with his unlawful attempts. Now there are questions to be asked and answers to be given to ease the public conscience. We ask everyone who has a hand in this unlawful process and expect the authorities to establish justice, not privilege:

1. Why was this petition addressed to the Press and Sports Prosecutor’s Office?

2. This Mr. Did it have something to do with the fact that the prosecutor was the Press and Sports Prosecutor a few months ago and they wanted to deliver a file to his address?

3. Just a few hours after the petition was submitted with its 580-page annexes, Mr. How were they examined by the prosecutor and were it determined that all the posts contained criminal elements?

4. Mr. Why did the prosecutor approve the petition at 17:29, 1 minute before the end of work?

5. What are the chances that this was done specifically to go to the judge on duty that day?

6. How was the entire file reviewed, just 37 minutes after the petition was submitted at 17:29, and how did the judgeship on duty approve the file in such a short time?

7. Why did the court on duty include an accusation (insult) that was not taken in court as an element of crime in the arrest warrant?

8. Although Musa Özsoy is registered with UETS and notification is required by law, why was no official notification made to Musa Özsoy even though months have passed?

9. Why is there an arrest warrant issued for Musa Özsoy? "being detained to see the case prosecutor" ve "seizure of electronic items" was instructed?

10. Why Mr. while the addresses of the parties are on the Anatolian side? Why did the prosecutor and the court on duty accept the file at Çağlayan Courthouse, even though they had no jurisdiction?

11. Does the deputy chief prosecutor named Osman Sağlam have anything to do with this file and Ülker’s lawyers?

12. Who or by whom was Murat Ülker promised to arrest Musa Özsoy?

Answers to these questions are essential in order for justice to be served fairly and to provide a suitable environment for Musa Özsoy to testify without depriving his personal rights, constitutional rights and citizenship rights. On the other hand, as Food Detective, we reiterate our call to immediately rectify this mistake and put an end to this unlawfulness that hurts the public conscience. Finally, we expect the HSK to evaluate our complaint, which covers the above questions regarding the process in question, and make its decision about the officials responsible for establishing justice.

We would like to express our gratitude again to all the public and our valuable followers."

Gidadedektifi.net

http://youtube.com/post/UgkxxN7fhm9AsFbvt196h8Ef_YnIuXx7nycA