Labour might be ridiculous on so many levels, but they can’t be said to be “right wing” with bills like this. This is a win for tenants.
raven43122 on
The mandatory threshold for an arrears eviction will increase from two months’ to three months’ rent.
If the landlord gives notice for these reasons and the tenant does not leave within four months
So 4 months of not paying before they can evict?
Electricbell20 on
Suddenly this sub will be ultra prolandlord in 3…2…1
boringfantasy on
Not great, not terrible. Seems like it could’ve gone further.
coffeewalnut08 on
Good news. This would positively impact the lives of up to 11 million people.
The results of a government getting important stuff done, rather than screeching about migrants and Muslims from the sidelines
Holty12345 on
Landlords have been reacting to this for a while
We’ve just purchased our new home and in the last 6 months we must’ve looked at a lot of houses. At least 90% of places we were told had previously been rented out for years and now up for sell.
The place we brought the owner couldn’t answer any of our questions really, because he hadn’t even been to the property in 20 years!
axthousandxhours on
Another comment for downvote gold here: I am sure this will make being able to secure a rental from a private owner that much easier for renters being accepted at application!
ultraboomkin on
Been looking forward to this coming in. Fantastic changes to rent/tenancies across the board.
Justneedsomehelps on
It’s crazy how some people think this will help them buy a house, or lower rents. It’s going to be the complete opposite.
TheCharalampos on
So happy they passed even if it is a massive headache for landlords.
Sport220 on
This is absolutely huge. Great news!
“If a tenant wants to leave they can, by giving two months’ notice, rather than being tied in for a year or more.”
GhostRiders on
This is not going to have the desire effect the Government wants and I say this as somebody who rented for nearly 15 years.
Yes we as renters do need extra protections but then so do Landlords.
The renters bill needed to be fair to both parties and this is very one sided.
All that is going to happen is many private renters selling up and Corporate Landlords taking over which is horrible.
That and less rental properties which will just push prices even higher.
himit on
> A home will now be rented on a “periodic” or rolling basis, rather than for a fixed 12 or 24-month contract. That means that if a tenant wants to stay in a property, they can.
What does this mean in practice? Month-to-month in the states normally means the landlord also only needs to give a month’s notice.
Overgrown_fetus1305 on
Something that’s not mentioned in the article, is an expansion of rent repayment orders, as there are now some new ones (of most note, knowingly or recklessly misusing a posession order), and raising the amount due back to the tenant, up to 2 years worth of rent (from one). They aren’t used super often, but they are quite noteworthy, and to any tenants who have had incorrect eviction notices served, and successfully challenged them in court, I shall simply note that you can, and should seek one against your landlord.
Also, fun fact, once the new database kicks in, other than a very small number of grounds, if the landlord isn’t on the database, they can’t actually evict you (once the relevant aspects of the law kick in). I’m sure we all know where this is going…
PackageOk4947 on
I want to rent out my spare room, what does this mean for me?
TheseStrategy5905 on
Now put a cap on greedy landlords charging ridiculous prices for shared accommodation and 1 bed flats.
neo2049 on
This will not fix renting for the poorest in society. It will make it worse. There needs to be more social housing but the government refuses to tax the rich.
Olduklurker on
We have holiday lets and HMRC used to allow winter rents for us but this bill has stopped that. Clearly a use case too far, but they managed to get student rentals covered. Overall a good thing but needs a bit more work.
SausageyPie on
Sounds very similar to the Landlord laws in California now under AB-1482…
Elgrandelulu on
Every one on here supporting this, you realise that landlords will just put rental prices higher, only rent to full time employment tenants, and many landlords will inevitably sell and therefore less houses available, subsequently meaning higher prices.
Source: I deal with rentals in london and this is already the discussion amongst many landlords. They will just filter out self employed/high risk tenants and put a higher guide price to counter the cap. But then again, what do you expect from a government that increased taxes already and going to increase them again next month.
ShrimplyKrilliant on
I’m looking forward to this being rolled out across the rest of the UK, hopefully.
DevilsAdvocate1662 on
I’m a landlord, well I was, my tenants gave notice last month. I didn’t even know about yearly contracts, I never put a date on the tenancy, all I said was one month’s notice if they want to move out, which they now are.
I know they’re few and far between, but not all landlords are shitty
MGD109 on
Alright! They’ve made some serious cockups, but it’s nice to see this government can still make some things better. More stuff like this, please.
Minimum_Definition75 on
It’s not really an issue to us. Our properties meet standards and we keep on top of maintenance.
We don’t usually increase the rent during tenancies (properties are popular with 2 or 3 year let’s). Unfortunately that will have to change if the government push our costs up.
Low income tenants with CCJ’s and poor credit will have no chance of renting privately.
We have been planning for this for a few years and already only take low risk tenants with good income and a guarantor. Plus we buy rent insurance. The sector as a whole has been slow to take this on board. But I’m seeing evidence that things are going to change and most landlords will reduce risk. Remember we often have 50 applicants for each property.
Expect more risky tenants queuing outside the council.
Abolishing S.21 seems fair but it can have a downside. Landlords with problem tenants often used it as the easiest way. Now they will have to use S.8 and the real reason they want to evict. Suddenly no fault evictions which made tenants eligible for council support become “fault” evictions where the council has no duty.
Supply is definitely being reduced as landlords sell up. Good news for those with money and credit to buy as more properties on the market.
So basically good for some tenants, bad news for others. Time will tell.
GiftedGeordie on
Holy fuck, a bit of unironic, legitimate good news. More of this, please.
25 Comments
Labour might be ridiculous on so many levels, but they can’t be said to be “right wing” with bills like this. This is a win for tenants.
The mandatory threshold for an arrears eviction will increase from two months’ to three months’ rent.
If the landlord gives notice for these reasons and the tenant does not leave within four months
So 4 months of not paying before they can evict?
Suddenly this sub will be ultra prolandlord in 3…2…1
Not great, not terrible. Seems like it could’ve gone further.
Good news. This would positively impact the lives of up to 11 million people.
The results of a government getting important stuff done, rather than screeching about migrants and Muslims from the sidelines
Landlords have been reacting to this for a while
We’ve just purchased our new home and in the last 6 months we must’ve looked at a lot of houses. At least 90% of places we were told had previously been rented out for years and now up for sell.
The place we brought the owner couldn’t answer any of our questions really, because he hadn’t even been to the property in 20 years!
Another comment for downvote gold here: I am sure this will make being able to secure a rental from a private owner that much easier for renters being accepted at application!
Been looking forward to this coming in. Fantastic changes to rent/tenancies across the board.
It’s crazy how some people think this will help them buy a house, or lower rents. It’s going to be the complete opposite.
So happy they passed even if it is a massive headache for landlords.
This is absolutely huge. Great news!
“If a tenant wants to leave they can, by giving two months’ notice, rather than being tied in for a year or more.”
This is not going to have the desire effect the Government wants and I say this as somebody who rented for nearly 15 years.
Yes we as renters do need extra protections but then so do Landlords.
The renters bill needed to be fair to both parties and this is very one sided.
All that is going to happen is many private renters selling up and Corporate Landlords taking over which is horrible.
That and less rental properties which will just push prices even higher.
> A home will now be rented on a “periodic” or rolling basis, rather than for a fixed 12 or 24-month contract. That means that if a tenant wants to stay in a property, they can.
What does this mean in practice? Month-to-month in the states normally means the landlord also only needs to give a month’s notice.
Something that’s not mentioned in the article, is an expansion of rent repayment orders, as there are now some new ones (of most note, knowingly or recklessly misusing a posession order), and raising the amount due back to the tenant, up to 2 years worth of rent (from one). They aren’t used super often, but they are quite noteworthy, and to any tenants who have had incorrect eviction notices served, and successfully challenged them in court, I shall simply note that you can, and should seek one against your landlord.
Also, fun fact, once the new database kicks in, other than a very small number of grounds, if the landlord isn’t on the database, they can’t actually evict you (once the relevant aspects of the law kick in). I’m sure we all know where this is going…
I want to rent out my spare room, what does this mean for me?
Now put a cap on greedy landlords charging ridiculous prices for shared accommodation and 1 bed flats.
This will not fix renting for the poorest in society. It will make it worse. There needs to be more social housing but the government refuses to tax the rich.
We have holiday lets and HMRC used to allow winter rents for us but this bill has stopped that. Clearly a use case too far, but they managed to get student rentals covered. Overall a good thing but needs a bit more work.
Sounds very similar to the Landlord laws in California now under AB-1482…
Every one on here supporting this, you realise that landlords will just put rental prices higher, only rent to full time employment tenants, and many landlords will inevitably sell and therefore less houses available, subsequently meaning higher prices.
Source: I deal with rentals in london and this is already the discussion amongst many landlords. They will just filter out self employed/high risk tenants and put a higher guide price to counter the cap. But then again, what do you expect from a government that increased taxes already and going to increase them again next month.
I’m looking forward to this being rolled out across the rest of the UK, hopefully.
I’m a landlord, well I was, my tenants gave notice last month. I didn’t even know about yearly contracts, I never put a date on the tenancy, all I said was one month’s notice if they want to move out, which they now are.
I know they’re few and far between, but not all landlords are shitty
Alright! They’ve made some serious cockups, but it’s nice to see this government can still make some things better. More stuff like this, please.
It’s not really an issue to us. Our properties meet standards and we keep on top of maintenance.
We don’t usually increase the rent during tenancies (properties are popular with 2 or 3 year let’s). Unfortunately that will have to change if the government push our costs up.
Low income tenants with CCJ’s and poor credit will have no chance of renting privately.
We have been planning for this for a few years and already only take low risk tenants with good income and a guarantor. Plus we buy rent insurance. The sector as a whole has been slow to take this on board. But I’m seeing evidence that things are going to change and most landlords will reduce risk. Remember we often have 50 applicants for each property.
Expect more risky tenants queuing outside the council.
Abolishing S.21 seems fair but it can have a downside. Landlords with problem tenants often used it as the easiest way. Now they will have to use S.8 and the real reason they want to evict. Suddenly no fault evictions which made tenants eligible for council support become “fault” evictions where the council has no duty.
Supply is definitely being reduced as landlords sell up. Good news for those with money and credit to buy as more properties on the market.
So basically good for some tenants, bad news for others. Time will tell.
Holy fuck, a bit of unironic, legitimate good news. More of this, please.