Share.

17 Comments

  1. StateOfTheEnemy on

    Could he explain why Gill and Farage sounded like they were reading from the same playbook?

  2. Hopeful_Stay_5276 on

    A serious party would say what they were doing to ensure there weren’t anymore Russian stooges in their ranks.

    Reform are trying to avert attention.

    Conclusions, Reform know they have more Russian stooges and are actively trying to protect them from scrutiny. A vote for Reform is a vote for Putin.

  3. > Gill was a member of the UK Independence Party, who then followed Mr Farage to the Brexit Party and ultimately was – for a brief period before his fall from grace – Reform UK’s leader in Wales

    Oh yeah the Brexit party, had forgotten all about them

  4. Impressive-Bird-6085 on

    Zia Yusuf would say that wouldn’t he? For the very reason that Nathan Gill and his Russian grifting activities strike at the heart of Reform U.K. and its political agenda. It’s political *kryptonite* to the party, Yusuf and its political leadership.

  5. Everyone else has nailed the obvious, so all I’m gonna add then, so 2019 is ancient history we can’t talk about anymore is Reforms official position?

    I presume going forward Reform will similarly not be referring to anything from before that time when trying to sow divison?

  6. QuailTechnical5143 on

    Or an omen of the future. Sure we’ll see many more like him, through stupidity or wilful cooperation.

  7. In which case, Zack Polanski’s hypnoboob debacle would be pre-historic, but that didn’t stop Yusuf brining it up in an attack ad.

  8. Ancient history? This is only the beginning. We need an urgent public inquiry into the extent of Russian bribery within Reform UK Ltd. It’s a matter if national security.

  9. Psychological-Ad1264 on

    When these traitorous cunts are ancient history in this country, that will be a great day.

  10. Mental-Vanilla- on

    Funny how all the far-right “patriots” aren’t rushing to upvote and comment on this one. You’d think they’d be concerned about foreign interference in our politics undermining our sovereignty.

  11. Ancient history Reform will not learn from, so we can expect a similar mistake early next year.

  12. Six years ago isn’t ancient history, especially because, unlike Reform, most of us weren’t born yesterday.

  13. Defending_wilts on

    I bet he regrets doing business studies with the Russians, but thats all ancient history now.

  14. Practical-Purchase-9 on

    > It comes after the Prime Minister Keir Starmer challenged Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to set up an investigation into Reform UK’s Russian links

    These demands that Reform investigate themselves are pretty weak, they won’t outright call Farage out and hold the party to account. I suspect it’s because the other parties don’t want to demand for external, independent investigations because that would open the door to themselves being investigated in a similar manner. There’s quite a lot of Russian money going around they don’t want being publicised.