FYI, the national average growth (Total Jobs 2024 – Total Jobs 2015) / Total Jobs 2015 is 11.5%

Posted by SouthNo2807

13 Comments

  1. daryl_hikikomori on

    This badly needs some labels. “Long-run change” in what? “Top metros” by what measure?

  2. At least for Chicago, the metro area population has barely changed this last decade so this isn’t that surprising

  3. nowwhathappens on

    I’m confused by the word “top” in the sentence “Bars show % change (2015-2024) for the top 20 metros.”

    Since (to name just two places) New York metro and LA metro are not here, this is not a list of the top 20 metros. So is this the top 20 by percent change? – but what would that mean – someone had to cherry-pick these 20 out of the data then. Long Run Underperformers – do you mean that these are the worst 20 major metros in job growth over the time period? Then maybe what you mean is “Bars show the % change in job growth for the 20 worst-performing metros in this time period out of x total metros evaluated.”

  4. Mysterious-Gold2220 on

    So these are the top metro areas for worst job growth? Does that mean New Orleans is the worst metro for job growth or the best on the list of the worst?

    What does Rank 1 on this list mean?

  5. Is it just me or are headlines from US media outlets more and more confusing to understand? “long-run change over the available window”, nowhere does it mention jobs or anything. What’s “long-run”? What window? Nowhere does it say _what’s_ actually changing. Is it number of jobs? Employment rate? What?

  6. Is this graph supposed to be the other way around?

    There’s data here… but it’s beauty escapes me