>She was warned against her fraudulent scheme at a staff meeting but continued to fiddle with her time sheets, it was said.
How a qualified lawyer can not only be foolish enough to defraud to this cartoonish extent, but even continue doing so after being informed that she’s been rumbled, is astounding.
dewittless on
Finally, a bootstrapper who takes their job (fraud) seriously!
HoagiePerogi on
Employee in con artist industry is a con artist.
I am shocked.
FetchThePenguins on
The old joke about the lawyer who dies and is met at the Pearly Gates with much fanfare by Jesus himself, because they totted up his timesheets and concluded he must’ve lived to be at least 158 years old, springs to mind.
scorpioncat on
Something doesn’t add up here. If 400% of her salary was only £70k, she wasn’t even being paid minimum wage, despite being a lawyer.
TVPaulD on
…well…I can see why she wasn’t an accountant at least.
Drummk on
Worked as a lawyer for 17 years but is too destitute to pay a relatively modest fine?
Sensitive_Echo5058 on
“She was warned against her fraudulent scheme at a staff meeting but continued to fiddle with her time sheets, it was said.
As the lawyer worked with people in prisons, her work was paid for by the Legal Aid Agency, which is publicly funded.”
She was ordered to pay back just £5,000 which is disgraceful. I wonder if this would be the same if the burden wasn’t the taxpayer.
There’s also a wider issue of lawyers charging in units to accumulate more wealth from fraudulently claiming time for work they did not do.
A quick thank you email, billed for 6 minutes or 1/6 of an hourly wage (set at £400) to the return of £66.67. Six thank you emails, billed each for 1/6 units (a total of one hour) to the return of £400.
Weak_Ad971 on
whats wrong with working 28 hours a day if you have the energy for it ?
EphemeraFury on
While she was obviously taking the piss there are plenty of law firms who will charge for an hours work even if it’s just a 5 minutes job to print off a template letter and sign it.
If you look at the numbers involved, legal aid was paying only £13.17 per hour, so I’m not surprised she was initially told to step it back a bit rather than fired, the firm probably has a lot of people reporting 16 hour days and she was the one who took it too far.
limeflavoured on
Lol, I’ve known people spuriously claim to be working well over 100 hours a week but this is a new one. Seems like its very obvious fraud and should probably also lead to criminal charges, especially since she was defrauding the taxpayer via legal aid.
Im_inside_you_ on
Back in my day we used to work 30 hours a day, 8 days a week.
Horror_Business1862 on
How did a system allow someone to log more than 12 hours let alone 28?
PracticalFocus3525 on
Pfft. That’s nothing. I work 80 hours a every half a day, 365 days a week
14 Comments
>She was warned against her fraudulent scheme at a staff meeting but continued to fiddle with her time sheets, it was said.
How a qualified lawyer can not only be foolish enough to defraud to this cartoonish extent, but even continue doing so after being informed that she’s been rumbled, is astounding.
Finally, a bootstrapper who takes their job (fraud) seriously!
Employee in con artist industry is a con artist.
I am shocked.
The old joke about the lawyer who dies and is met at the Pearly Gates with much fanfare by Jesus himself, because they totted up his timesheets and concluded he must’ve lived to be at least 158 years old, springs to mind.
Something doesn’t add up here. If 400% of her salary was only £70k, she wasn’t even being paid minimum wage, despite being a lawyer.
…well…I can see why she wasn’t an accountant at least.
Worked as a lawyer for 17 years but is too destitute to pay a relatively modest fine?
“She was warned against her fraudulent scheme at a staff meeting but continued to fiddle with her time sheets, it was said.
As the lawyer worked with people in prisons, her work was paid for by the Legal Aid Agency, which is publicly funded.”
She was ordered to pay back just £5,000 which is disgraceful. I wonder if this would be the same if the burden wasn’t the taxpayer.
There’s also a wider issue of lawyers charging in units to accumulate more wealth from fraudulently claiming time for work they did not do.
A quick thank you email, billed for 6 minutes or 1/6 of an hourly wage (set at £400) to the return of £66.67. Six thank you emails, billed each for 1/6 units (a total of one hour) to the return of £400.
whats wrong with working 28 hours a day if you have the energy for it ?
While she was obviously taking the piss there are plenty of law firms who will charge for an hours work even if it’s just a 5 minutes job to print off a template letter and sign it.
If you look at the numbers involved, legal aid was paying only £13.17 per hour, so I’m not surprised she was initially told to step it back a bit rather than fired, the firm probably has a lot of people reporting 16 hour days and she was the one who took it too far.
Lol, I’ve known people spuriously claim to be working well over 100 hours a week but this is a new one. Seems like its very obvious fraud and should probably also lead to criminal charges, especially since she was defrauding the taxpayer via legal aid.
Back in my day we used to work 30 hours a day, 8 days a week.
How did a system allow someone to log more than 12 hours let alone 28?
Pfft. That’s nothing. I work 80 hours a every half a day, 365 days a week