5 Comments

  1. In the wake of settling the Hans Island dispute and ending the “Whiskey War”, we should double down on our excellent relations with Denmark and cooperate on a Northwest Passage defence strategy. We have many shared cultural values/traditions and economic interests, they’re a natural partner for the century.

  2. Stunning-Praline-116 on

    Keep reminding the DJT regime that Canada is also not for sale just as Greenland is not for sale. Not everyone wants Americas version of “democracy”.
    We stand with Greenland and any other independent nation facing unwarranted tyranny and hostility from the DJT regime.

  3. And Cuba, and Colombia, and Mexico…

    And any other sovereign nation that’s being threatened with invasion and head-of-state kidnapping, because it’s not something that should be tolerated, period.

  4. They have a monarchy, we have a monarchy, so all we gotta do is wed the two monarchies together and unite our kingdoms! 😆

  5. stilljustacatinacage on

    > The U.S. President also repeated his claim that the U.S. ‘needs Greenland’:

    Yes, because if the USA were to invade a neighboring country, like say, Canada, any support from Europe would have to pass by Greenland, and being able to park a couple squadrons of aircraft there would be all’s needed to stop anything but a full mobilization from the EU / UK (which will never happen), without needing to tie up any of their aircraft carriers.

    Yes, the USA already has air bases there, but presumably without ‘taking’ the island, Denmark wouldn’t just let them operate normally while attacking a NATO country. The moment the USA attacks Greenland, NATO ends and they get to interdict anything from the EU from arms to humanitarian aid.

    Trump recently said he’d talk about Greenland “in a couple months”, so that’s how long we have until we find out if we’re next.