Mandatory Palestine: Land Ownership in 1945

Posted by JustSomeCells

23 Comments

  1. You-all-suck-so-bad on

    And now Palestinians have exclusive control over about 5% of this land. Some are even able to visit other villages if they jump through enough hoops.

    Gotta love the old narrative about it being a complicated dispute between two equal people that just want the same things.

  2. Wondering why there are so many blank spots in this map?

    Only 25% of Mandatory Palestine was covered by cadastral survey by 1947, meaning that land rights were mostly customary and the colonial government had not officiated most of the land.

    Of that which had been recorded, we don’t know about a lot of the erstwhile property claims to make maps in the present day like this because…

    …During the 1948 Nakba, Zionist troops deliberately burnt British administrative offices in which property records were kept, ensuring it was impossible for many Palestinians to prove they had any claim to their lands.

  3. Admirable-Ad3408 on

    This shows why the UN partition borders were so hideous. They basically had an impossible task

  4. Why did the people in all the blue land have to defend themselves so well? Couldn’t they have just let themselves get wiped out?

  5. mixing up the terms arab and jewish with palestine and israel feels like it could lead to some racist and antisemitic outcomes. most jews are not israeli, same with arabs and palestinians

  6. LeaguePuzzled3606 on

    Some context that often gets left out of the discussion.

    Traditional land ownership in Palestine was highly informal, to live and work on it for a few hundred years made it “yours”. A lot of land was also considered community owned. Halfway through the 1800s the Ottomans sought to formalize ownership. This caused two great fears to crop up, conscription and taxation. In an effort by land owning peasants to avoid both, a lot of land was not registered to the informal owners but to wealthier city elites who were protected from both due to their connections.

    A few decades later Jews begin their mass immigration to Palestine and they start buying up land, *from the Ottoman authorities and the city elites*. So you have a situation where the actual people whose families would have been working and living on the land for hundreds of years had it sold out from under them and the newly arrived owners demanded they vacate the land.

  7. AcanthocephalaTop462 on

    So if a group of ppl immigrate somewhere or become refugees there and buy up most of the land can they just declare independence and become their own state?

  8. Not sure why anybody thought it was a smart idea to partition *this* based on religious lines instead of creating a state with equal rights for all. Imagine if Lebanon or Syria were partitioned this way.

  9. Tbh, the current state of Israel doesn’t look too different from this from a land ownership perspective, the main problem is Israeli state sovereignty over large areas where Arabs did not want Jewish nationalist statehood. Also no one really owns land in the state of Israel, it’s just leased from the government, so you’d see why that’s infuriating for Arabs to lease from a govt that by definition does not represent them. The biggest difference now in demographic shift is the West Bank settlements and the destruction of Gaza. I know a lot of people are gonna want the entire map to be green but that is about as likely to happen as the entire map being blue.

  10. Sad thing is, the “Arabs” of the Levant are not genetically Arabian, they are Levantine, same as Jews. They are the same people separated by culture/religion.

  11. ZealousidealPound460 on

    Minds eye: this doesn’t look like reality

    Reading the actual title: this was 80 years ago

  12. You mean Palestinian, not Arab. Given most Palestinians can trace their ancestry back to before the first Islamic caliphate, most Palestinians would have Semite heritage, not Arabic.