Its actually really cool to look at the companies Facebook posts that they congratulate each other. Blue Origin and Space X both have reusable rockets but competition is bringing costs way way down. If we are to build a moon base, our children will be taking trips in thier lifetime. We were told that we would but nasa is a shell of what it was.
eva01beast on
How are you comparing national space programs when private launch companies?
Edit: also, some these organisations are not even launching rockets of the same class.
kramulous on
Australia finally with an entry!!!!
Gilmore Space Technologies!!!
RichardSwellington on
Destination would be interesting to factor in. For example, suborbital lofts versus geostationary injection.
9 Comments
Visualization made with my website FlightAtlas.org
Insane how SpaceX climbed on top
Now if you really want to see a lead, multiply it by payload capacity in kg
So SpaceX has more launches then the rest of the world combined, impressive.
It would be more helpful if you had defined ‘CASC’ [[China Aeropace Science Corporation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Aerospace_Science_and_Technology_Corporation?wprov=sfti1)]
‘ISRO’ [[Indian Space Research Organization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISRO?wprov=sfti1)]
Its actually really cool to look at the companies Facebook posts that they congratulate each other. Blue Origin and Space X both have reusable rockets but competition is bringing costs way way down. If we are to build a moon base, our children will be taking trips in thier lifetime. We were told that we would but nasa is a shell of what it was.
How are you comparing national space programs when private launch companies?
Edit: also, some these organisations are not even launching rockets of the same class.
Australia finally with an entry!!!!
Gilmore Space Technologies!!!
Destination would be interesting to factor in. For example, suborbital lofts versus geostationary injection.