That’s interesting seeing as they are the least involved in nato (gdp % wise) from big members
Maybe eu army would interest them enough to chip in
justbecauseyoumademe on
Agreed
[deleted] on
[deleted]
Smart-Protection-845 on
Maybe Spain could also send a couple of their soldiers instead of talking a lot
Edit to Greenland
AdminEating_Dragon on
Agreed, but I hope they start actively participating, they are the 4th biggest EU country and they show zero interest to be in the “big boys” discussion on security, Russia and proactive deterrence.
starlordbg on
Absolutely agree, we must have everything the americans have under a united european command.
There has been a negative feeling towards the army in some sectors of the Spanish society, particularly since the Civil War. Investing in a European army is definitely easier to sell for a centre-left party.
popsyking on
Yes now let’s just do it, meeting on Monday to setup the framework, cmon
Mirageswirl on
More important than an army is a strategic nuclear deterrence that can replace the US former role globally.
LingonberryNo3548 on
This is all well and good until you start asking who is going to be the ultimate authority. Even if you share it and say military action would need a majority vote, which country is going to be happy when their people are returned in body bags for military action that they didn’t want.
Besides, you still have countries like Ireland completely reliant on non EU countries providing their security because they refuse to spend any money. Are they going to pay in or will they just expect to benefit from it with no contribution?
Hutcho12 on
Going to cost us way more but seems like it’s necessary since America went off the rails. We all, America included, had a good run. We could all halve our spending if the alliance held as it did before. But trust in America is gone now for at least a generation.
zarafff69 on
This is the moment to do so! Let’s go guys!!
wabblakadabbla on
Many people here are ignoring the fact that Spain is one of the few countries that has been involved always in every nato mission, like air policing the baltics intercepting Russian planes, deployment of ground troops, tanks and antiair defenses in Latvia, or leading the EU Atalanta mission against piracy.
Also, last years literally doubled %gdp defense spending (that before that, yeah, was pretty low), only opposing to commit to the 5% target pulled out of Trump’s ass.
dodge-thesystem on
Says the country that can’t even contribute the minimum to NATO
EconomyCauliflower43 on
Wonder how the likes of Ireland handle this, instead of hiding behind Europe from Russia the new threat is across the Atlantic. Forward location for EU navel base and airforce base for protecting shipping to Greenland and Canada.
_MoneyHustard_ on
Yeah…. Like two decades ago
citrusman7 on
will everyone need to learn the same language?
Der_Dingsbums on
Let’s begin with the federation to control the army. A European army controlled. By the council where every member state tries to benefit the most/push it’s own agenda will be an absolute shitshow
rovonz on
To avoid dependence on **third world countries** *
MercatorLondon on
Just make sure it doesn’t operate only with approval of every member 🙂
wonderland_peasant on
France has been advocating for that since 1950 and repeating it nonstop till that date.
The NATO organization (always led by US generals) always officially advocates not as “a moral hazard” and a low blow to the USA (being strategically independent is a moral hazard for the USA hegemony).
Each time new EU members were added, they would be opposed to that due to timorousness and US military ties (Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Denmark, Malta, Sweden, Czechia, and Austria were always opposed to European Army building up). Another side of the story is some countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Italy, Spain…) agreed to the idea but were in reality always torpedoing it to keep their Atlantic “privileged link” with Washington and particularly their nuclear umbrella at the cost of total military dependence on the USA. After being mocked for 75 years about their European strategic independence will, France is no more alone in understanding the never-ending carrot-and-stick American’s trap and the “spend each time less money on military” because someone will come to save us is simply strenghten the american leach for the whole Europe.
Unending-Flexionator on
a centralized government! then corporations can take it over too.
DGhitza on
For me Spain always felt so removed from everything happening in Europe and you woudn`t think that as Spain with France, Germany, UK and Italy are usually seen as the heavy lifters in Europe
Also Portugal. Seems so isolated from everything happening on the continent. They are just chilling.
eepos96 on
I am suprised by spain since they invest the least in military. And are relatively safe, surrounded by allies to north and neutral/friend nations to south.
26 Comments
That’s interesting seeing as they are the least involved in nato (gdp % wise) from big members
Maybe eu army would interest them enough to chip in
Agreed
[deleted]
Maybe Spain could also send a couple of their soldiers instead of talking a lot
Edit to Greenland
Agreed, but I hope they start actively participating, they are the 4th biggest EU country and they show zero interest to be in the “big boys” discussion on security, Russia and proactive deterrence.
Absolutely agree, we must have everything the americans have under a united european command.
Incoming Dutch PM also [calling](https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Ftdq1gpdddbdg1.png) for the creation of a European Army. It’s an idea whose time has come. Macron was right.
Perhaps Spain would like to actually spend some money on defence. [Why Spain is Nato’s laggard on defence spending](https://www.ft.com/content/5803ccb4-5d49-4331-bdbf-100d15cd6526)
There has been a negative feeling towards the army in some sectors of the Spanish society, particularly since the Civil War. Investing in a European army is definitely easier to sell for a centre-left party.
Yes now let’s just do it, meeting on Monday to setup the framework, cmon
More important than an army is a strategic nuclear deterrence that can replace the US former role globally.
This is all well and good until you start asking who is going to be the ultimate authority. Even if you share it and say military action would need a majority vote, which country is going to be happy when their people are returned in body bags for military action that they didn’t want.
Besides, you still have countries like Ireland completely reliant on non EU countries providing their security because they refuse to spend any money. Are they going to pay in or will they just expect to benefit from it with no contribution?
Going to cost us way more but seems like it’s necessary since America went off the rails. We all, America included, had a good run. We could all halve our spending if the alliance held as it did before. But trust in America is gone now for at least a generation.
This is the moment to do so! Let’s go guys!!
Many people here are ignoring the fact that Spain is one of the few countries that has been involved always in every nato mission, like air policing the baltics intercepting Russian planes, deployment of ground troops, tanks and antiair defenses in Latvia, or leading the EU Atalanta mission against piracy.
Also, last years literally doubled %gdp defense spending (that before that, yeah, was pretty low), only opposing to commit to the 5% target pulled out of Trump’s ass.
Says the country that can’t even contribute the minimum to NATO
Wonder how the likes of Ireland handle this, instead of hiding behind Europe from Russia the new threat is across the Atlantic. Forward location for EU navel base and airforce base for protecting shipping to Greenland and Canada.
Yeah…. Like two decades ago
will everyone need to learn the same language?
Let’s begin with the federation to control the army. A European army controlled. By the council where every member state tries to benefit the most/push it’s own agenda will be an absolute shitshow
To avoid dependence on **third world countries** *
Just make sure it doesn’t operate only with approval of every member 🙂
France has been advocating for that since 1950 and repeating it nonstop till that date.
The NATO organization (always led by US generals) always officially advocates not as “a moral hazard” and a low blow to the USA (being strategically independent is a moral hazard for the USA hegemony).
Each time new EU members were added, they would be opposed to that due to timorousness and US military ties (Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Denmark, Malta, Sweden, Czechia, and Austria were always opposed to European Army building up). Another side of the story is some countries (Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Italy, Spain…) agreed to the idea but were in reality always torpedoing it to keep their Atlantic “privileged link” with Washington and particularly their nuclear umbrella at the cost of total military dependence on the USA. After being mocked for 75 years about their European strategic independence will, France is no more alone in understanding the never-ending carrot-and-stick American’s trap and the “spend each time less money on military” because someone will come to save us is simply strenghten the american leach for the whole Europe.
a centralized government! then corporations can take it over too.
For me Spain always felt so removed from everything happening in Europe and you woudn`t think that as Spain with France, Germany, UK and Italy are usually seen as the heavy lifters in Europe
Also Portugal. Seems so isolated from everything happening on the continent. They are just chilling.
I am suprised by spain since they invest the least in military. And are relatively safe, surrounded by allies to north and neutral/friend nations to south.