Share.

11 Comments

  1. People riding these bikes as an alternative to owning a car – I think that’s great.

    People riding these bikes and pretending they are exercising – they are a joke.

  2. might be interesting to see percentages of fire accident in each of these disciplines instead of raw numbers.

  3. I’m more concerned about what’s happening with the busses. I assume there are a couple hundred thousand ebikes in London, and only a couple thousand busses. And while there are plenty of cheapo dodgy e-bikes out there, I would expect busses to be somewhat higher grade and better maintained, and not 9 times more likely to catch fire than bikes, by ratio.

  4. Kinda missing the graph comparing this with conventional car fires on a per-car basis. (And indeed other fire sources)

  5. I love e-bikes, but we really gotta crack down on the dodgy imported conversion kits/batteries of dubious quality!

    And install way more outside bike storage so they’re not catching fire in

  6. Consistent-Annual268 on

    This needs to be per vehicle to be if any use. The raw number doesn’t tell us the rate of problems these transport modes are having.

  7. For me it is unclear what the data includes. In the source link from the other comment it states EV/ Li-Ion fires. But not every EV fire is a battery fire and gas cars also have li-Ion batteries that burn. So for me the included vehicles are unclear. Anyone got a methodology description? Judging by the amount of busses in London (which is 9000 and 2000EV according to other comments) 20 seems high. But it’s also 0 before 2019 so…

  8. Could you make it so it’s relative to the numbers of bike/cars etc

    Also a chart with 5 lines is not exactly beautiful data