> In a statement, he said: “I have serious concerns about the impartiality of the hustings that have been organised for tonight. Previous statements by the organising group give the clear impression that a fair and level platform will not be provided for all candidates, so on that basis I will not be attending.”
Straight out of the Trump Playbook, chapter one, paragraph two.
JuanitaMerkin on
I used to follow this guy on Twitter a good 10+ years ago.
He was a university academic who wrote a book about UKIP and then went native, integrating himself into the people he was supposed to be studying.
All very odd.
Archistotle on
“I have reason to doubt the impartiality of the proceedings”
You know, I remember Farage saying something similar in the BBC election debate around 2015.
You know why I remember him saying it? **Because he still fucking showed up to say it.**
They’re not bothered by their pretend persecution, they’re bothered by the fact their opponents are wise to their tricks now and will make them look like fools in public.
v45-KEZ on
Classic – duck any non-scripted environment and cry about it not being “impartial” because they’re refusing to coddle him
Prisoner3000 on
These people fold under even the slightest questioning. Anything other than fawning is considered by them to be bias or the questioner having an “agenda”
Cowards
jtrimm98 on
Just like Farage being too much of a coward to debate Polanski!
loonongrass on
Funny this comes after Reform throwing a hissy fit over not being invited to speak at a uni debating society.
HeadBat1863 on
I heard he didn’t turn up because Reform wanted a chunk of their bussed-in supporters to be in the audience (and not actual constituents).
This is why *BBC Question Time* has been bad for Britain. Their habit of having political plants in the audience is now something that twats like Reform now demand as standard.
No_Atmosphere8146 on
No point in opening yourself up to scrutiny when you’re winning. I don’t like him, but I get it.
yeastysoaps on
This just in: Matt Goodwin is a massive wet wipe.
If you don’t want to be challenged by your potential constituents then you have no business running.
TheCharalampos on
To be fair everyone knows Reform members need to be in the right soil, heavily sprinkled with sympathetic audience plants or they wilt.
OinkyDoinky13 on
The only way Reform can go is down in the polls; they’ve peaked, so they’re better avoiding scrutiny. Boris did the same and Trump too. There is no advantage to them attending any uncontrolled media scrutiny.
RaymondBumcheese on
I get it. Why turn up to a level playing field hustings when you can just lie on twitter to a much bigger audience with absolutely no push back?
GeekyGamer2022 on
They hate being confronted with reality.
Or difficult questions.
Or anything that distracts from their imaginary grievances.
They hide in the shadows, call everything a conspiracy and continue pumping out social media bollocks.
100% the Trump playbook.
west_country_wendigo on
Goodwin is a coward, bully and grifter. Reform will cheat as much as they can, and will vague sentiment over candidate or specifics.
Any_Association405 on
Why can’t those in the electorate taken in by Refirm wake up and smell the coffee. These guys aren’t anti establishment, they are pro billionaire elites and don’t give a toss about the regular folk of this country.
GeorginaFlopworthy on
Watching an interview he had with [Medhi Hassan](https://youtu.be/BwB6x8CUkZA?si=y-FGcxq4zfco3YvI) last year and the guy comes across as lacking any kind of charisma, pushing bullshit and dog whistles and generally someone who is likely to create a negative opinion when seen ‘in the flesh’. Honestly, avoiding a hustings or any sort of public ‘debate’ would probably be quite sensible.
Redcoat-Mic on
There’s no reason for him to attend.
The people voting Reform will be vote for him whatever, they don’t need to hear reasoning or policies. They’re doing it anyway because “change”.
Him putting himself in the spotlight and doubtlessly fucking it up like all Reform candidates put under the slightest bit of scrutiny will only harm his chances.
Better to just make baseless accusations and ride it out.
18 Comments
> In a statement, he said: “I have serious concerns about the impartiality of the hustings that have been organised for tonight. Previous statements by the organising group give the clear impression that a fair and level platform will not be provided for all candidates, so on that basis I will not be attending.”
Straight out of the Trump Playbook, chapter one, paragraph two.
I used to follow this guy on Twitter a good 10+ years ago.
He was a university academic who wrote a book about UKIP and then went native, integrating himself into the people he was supposed to be studying.
All very odd.
“I have reason to doubt the impartiality of the proceedings”
You know, I remember Farage saying something similar in the BBC election debate around 2015.
You know why I remember him saying it? **Because he still fucking showed up to say it.**
They’re not bothered by their pretend persecution, they’re bothered by the fact their opponents are wise to their tricks now and will make them look like fools in public.
Classic – duck any non-scripted environment and cry about it not being “impartial” because they’re refusing to coddle him
These people fold under even the slightest questioning. Anything other than fawning is considered by them to be bias or the questioner having an “agenda”
Cowards
Just like Farage being too much of a coward to debate Polanski!
Funny this comes after Reform throwing a hissy fit over not being invited to speak at a uni debating society.
I heard he didn’t turn up because Reform wanted a chunk of their bussed-in supporters to be in the audience (and not actual constituents).
This is why *BBC Question Time* has been bad for Britain. Their habit of having political plants in the audience is now something that twats like Reform now demand as standard.
No point in opening yourself up to scrutiny when you’re winning. I don’t like him, but I get it.
This just in: Matt Goodwin is a massive wet wipe.
If you don’t want to be challenged by your potential constituents then you have no business running.
To be fair everyone knows Reform members need to be in the right soil, heavily sprinkled with sympathetic audience plants or they wilt.
The only way Reform can go is down in the polls; they’ve peaked, so they’re better avoiding scrutiny. Boris did the same and Trump too. There is no advantage to them attending any uncontrolled media scrutiny.
I get it. Why turn up to a level playing field hustings when you can just lie on twitter to a much bigger audience with absolutely no push back?
They hate being confronted with reality.
Or difficult questions.
Or anything that distracts from their imaginary grievances.
They hide in the shadows, call everything a conspiracy and continue pumping out social media bollocks.
100% the Trump playbook.
Goodwin is a coward, bully and grifter. Reform will cheat as much as they can, and will vague sentiment over candidate or specifics.
Why can’t those in the electorate taken in by Refirm wake up and smell the coffee. These guys aren’t anti establishment, they are pro billionaire elites and don’t give a toss about the regular folk of this country.
Watching an interview he had with [Medhi Hassan](https://youtu.be/BwB6x8CUkZA?si=y-FGcxq4zfco3YvI) last year and the guy comes across as lacking any kind of charisma, pushing bullshit and dog whistles and generally someone who is likely to create a negative opinion when seen ‘in the flesh’. Honestly, avoiding a hustings or any sort of public ‘debate’ would probably be quite sensible.
There’s no reason for him to attend.
The people voting Reform will be vote for him whatever, they don’t need to hear reasoning or policies. They’re doing it anyway because “change”.
Him putting himself in the spotlight and doubtlessly fucking it up like all Reform candidates put under the slightest bit of scrutiny will only harm his chances.
Better to just make baseless accusations and ride it out.