I will not listen to a billionaire who laments uncontrolled immigration, whilst alternatively using foreign money and labour to suppress wages and lower the living standards of British people, all while living in an off shore tax haven.
beach-chicken10 on
Like it or not, Ratcliffe is perfectly within his rights to say this. The PM should focus on keeping his own house in order, whilst he is the head of that house that is
xParesh on
And what authority or power does the PM have to ask an ordinary citizen to apologise?
Hasn’t Starmer got work to do like reducing the UKs highest energy prices and cost of living?
I’m not supporting Ratcliffes comments in any way but I think Starmer would find himself more popular if he actually got on with doing to job of being PM.
Pocto on
I think I speak on behalf of all nations that have been colonised by the UK when I say “hahahahaha, you what mate? Get fucked tax nonce”.
radiant_0wl on
I somewhat gasped when I first saw what Ratcliffe said, but I don’t think he’s wrong.
It’s not a word I would have used, but people express themselves differently. It’s not something that requires apologising for, in my opinion, although I suspect Starmer asking him to apologise just reaffirms the view that he’s too weak to make difficult decisions.
Politically, my thoughts aren’t too dissimilar to the governments position on the new changes to the immigration system, except I’d automatically reject any migrants who entered the UK illegally from making asylum claims. However, I’d open up the possibility of claims being made via our embassies, assuming they are sponsored by our ambassadors or their team and meet strict thresholds. We shouldn’t be obliged or held liable to investigate every applicant, but having an eye and an ear open so we can help when it’s an option should be our goal.
So I wouldn’t say I have an extreme view, I suspect Farage and Ratcliffe has a more populist view than Starmer.
Ambitious_Hornet8206 on
Why need he apologise for his opinion? He is not politically responsible to Sir Kier.
Torco2 on
Yet in the selfsame article, it says the population has gone up by almost 3 million in five years. All through immigration not native natural growth, which is in decline.
The gaslighting, cope and delusion is a spectacle to behold. I’d respect the Establishment ghouls more if they simply admitted they simply don’t care which interchangable lesser biomass (in their eyes) they rule over.
Instead it’s this duplicitous shite, spouted by shitebags.
[deleted] on
[removed]
TokyoBaguette on
Let him speak…
It’s good to know what people like him actually think.
Then let the irony sink in looking at his own behaviour or a cursory look at a history book.
11 Comments
[removed]
[removed]
I will not listen to a billionaire who laments uncontrolled immigration, whilst alternatively using foreign money and labour to suppress wages and lower the living standards of British people, all while living in an off shore tax haven.
Like it or not, Ratcliffe is perfectly within his rights to say this. The PM should focus on keeping his own house in order, whilst he is the head of that house that is
And what authority or power does the PM have to ask an ordinary citizen to apologise?
Hasn’t Starmer got work to do like reducing the UKs highest energy prices and cost of living?
I’m not supporting Ratcliffes comments in any way but I think Starmer would find himself more popular if he actually got on with doing to job of being PM.
I think I speak on behalf of all nations that have been colonised by the UK when I say “hahahahaha, you what mate? Get fucked tax nonce”.
I somewhat gasped when I first saw what Ratcliffe said, but I don’t think he’s wrong.
It’s not a word I would have used, but people express themselves differently. It’s not something that requires apologising for, in my opinion, although I suspect Starmer asking him to apologise just reaffirms the view that he’s too weak to make difficult decisions.
Politically, my thoughts aren’t too dissimilar to the governments position on the new changes to the immigration system, except I’d automatically reject any migrants who entered the UK illegally from making asylum claims. However, I’d open up the possibility of claims being made via our embassies, assuming they are sponsored by our ambassadors or their team and meet strict thresholds. We shouldn’t be obliged or held liable to investigate every applicant, but having an eye and an ear open so we can help when it’s an option should be our goal.
So I wouldn’t say I have an extreme view, I suspect Farage and Ratcliffe has a more populist view than Starmer.
Why need he apologise for his opinion? He is not politically responsible to Sir Kier.
Yet in the selfsame article, it says the population has gone up by almost 3 million in five years. All through immigration not native natural growth, which is in decline.
The gaslighting, cope and delusion is a spectacle to behold. I’d respect the Establishment ghouls more if they simply admitted they simply don’t care which interchangable lesser biomass (in their eyes) they rule over.
Instead it’s this duplicitous shite, spouted by shitebags.
[removed]
Let him speak…
It’s good to know what people like him actually think.
Then let the irony sink in looking at his own behaviour or a cursory look at a history book.