Share.

13 Comments

  1. How is “Hej sokoΕ‚y” a patriotic song?

    >The Stepy AkermaΕ„skie by Mickiewicz that we read at school were actually written in the now-famous Crimea area of modern-day Ukraine

    Wait, really? A poem about travelling through the steppes of Crimea was written in Crimea?

    Hilarious article.

  2. It’s not really that complicated. It’s simply related to history. Especially when Poland had many allies and we actually mattered on the map.

  3. Almost as big mystery as why America’s Declaration of Independence is written in English rather than Americanish

  4. It is the conflict between what really is Polish tradition and culture and what was forcefully defined as “Polish” during occupation of the country in the 19th century. Similar problems are with definitions of other “nationalities”, too – but it is the most visible for countries which were under occupation during the 19th century.

    “State nations” or “national states” are a relatively recent concept – first emerged during the French Revolution (had to replace the monarch) and then used to creation of the unified German state (too many monarchs…). For most of the European history the continent was divided between monarchies, which were defined only by the allegiance to its monarch. Usually were treated as simply owned by the monarch – parts could be sold, received, borrowed etc. … including all the population.

    There is zero sense of talking about “Poland”, “Germany”, “Russia”, etc. in the context of times earlier than 16th-17th century, unfortunately we all have been hammered at schools with “national history” courses which, despite often contradicting each other, made us hesitant to abandon all the 19th century nationalistic mythology. Government-sponsored 19th-century “ethnographers” defined “ethnicities” according to who was paying for the “research”, and those are our “historical sources” today.

    Every war or even threat of an armed conflict increased nationalism and created new mythology. Each “national” government guards its own version of history and considers any questioning it as an existential threat to the state. Some nationalisms were aggressive (Russian, German are prime examples in Europe), some were created as a defense – like most of the Central European ones. That’s why the definition of what is “Polish” is so narrow and so unfitting to the real history of the people and the region.

  5. Very simple : modern day borders
    It’s not a remotely notable that countries change and shift borders and share culture in weird relation to geography

  6. > > not written in modern-day Poland.

    > > 19th century Poland

    That tells me all I need to know: the author has no fucking clue about Polish history, or he’d know that “19th century Poland” is an oxymoron.