
King Charles first official portrait is vandalised by animal rights activists: Two Animal Rising protesters cover monarch’s face with Wallace and Gromit image and stick on speech bubble message about ‘cruelty on RSPCA farms’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13517609/Ed-Riley-Toby-Meyjes-Eleanor-Blake-Dan-Sales-king-charles-portrait-vandalised-philip-mould-gallery-london-animal-rising.html
Posted by PlainPiece

26 Comments
for once not the climate protesters, makes sense since charles cares for the environment, dont see why they targeted him in particular but that painting could be a target
I don’t know a single person who is in support of this sort of protest.
Outside of social media where the fanatics make the most noise. Normal people do not support these sorts of protests in my experience. Everyone is tired of it.
Edit: I’ve been informed they didn’t damage the painting at all. I misunderstood the use of the word vandalism.
I think this is clearly different to intentionally damaging art or public property. I’ll leave the comment up for clarity. Thank you for correcting me.
Thank god they didn’t throw red paint over it, they might have really ruined it.
Have musuems and galleries just accepted this is the new normal for their venues?
I’m sick to death of random acts of thuggery being called “protest” and judges giving nothingy sentences for them. Minimum sentencing needs to be increased.
Now, that said, I totally agree with their “cause”. It’s an absolute disgrace what the RSPCA signs off on and it’s even more disgusting that it only exists to rubber stamp unnecessary cruelty committed in the name of putting food on the table.
Oh no, how terrible. Now he’ll have to get a new one. Aww.
Soon, courtesy of all these vandals, everything is going to be behind reinforced glass and fencing. It does matter that art, statues and all that is accessible and visible.
For reference, a video documenting just a snipped of the cruelty they uncovered at RSPCA-assured farms: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfM5VRMl7wk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfM5VRMl7wk)
Oh god they seem to have smeared some sort of red paint all over the frame.
Shite painting anyway and at least the cause is decent
WHYD THEYD HAVE TO DRAG POOR WALLACE INTO IT JUST LET HIM CONTINUE FANTASIZING ABOUT EATING HIS MOON CHEESE HE DOESNT NEED THIS. WALLACE LOVEESSSSSSS CHEESE SO IDK WHY THEY EVEN CHOSE HIM FOR AN ANIMAL RIGHTS PROTEST
What most people don’t realise is, this is their second go at it, first time they threw red paint all over it
Isn’t King Charles really progressive about environmental issues? Moreso than the government in many ways?
Animal rights protesters make me laugh, on the one hand they want rights for animals on the other they have no respect for people or property.
Any protest that affects the monarchy is a good protest.
Oh well, I guess he better get a new one from an artist that doesn’t for some reason try to paint him as Vigo the Carpathian.
Probably do the picture a favour. It’s awful work. I don’t know why but all I think when I see it is spag bol. And now I want spag bol every time.
It’s a shame, the Vigo the Carpathian look was a good look for that Charles portrait.
Bit strange to target this considering he’s one of the few people who cares and has spent decades talking about the very thing they are protesting.
Well it’s not like they could just throw paint at it.
>cover monarch’s face with Wallace and Gromit image and stick on speech bubble
Hardly vandalism is it? Daily Mail headline writers working overtime
I don’t inherently have an issue with protests but I don’t understand why so many of the recent ones have been so *boring* and not directly relevant. Feels like they are picking cause & action out of the hat each time.
Looking forward to the upcoming [deflate Jeremy Clarkson’s tyres] in order to [raise awareness of an owl sanctuary] /s
Have Aardman commented?
They might not want to be associated with this.
Or…
Either way, I’m sick of these ‘protests’.
Jesus what a shit-show this thread is. More people outraged by a rich old man’s painting than they are by the way farmed animals are treated.
These have to be anti-activist plants imo, climate activism is one of those topics with no easy way to do “correctly” but this kind of events just feels to me outrage-baiting and drama-farming
Article by Lettice Bromovksy.
Who the f calls their kid Lettuce?