People say a lot of things when they’re upset. Their actions speak a lot louder and when it comes to these two, tens of millions of taxpayer pounds. Make of that what you will.
the-player-of-games on
The briefings to paint Queen Mummy in a good light have begun
Should not have shielded him while she was head of the family
Necessary-Product361 on
Well, she also saw him as her favourite son and sent him £12 million to help cover up his sexual crimes.
LeaguePuzzled3606 on
Tactical leak. Fact is mummy protected him her entire life.
HMWYA on
I don’t know, mate, if I thought someone deserved to be punched, I wouldn’t contribute millions of pounds towards silencing their victims. Sorry if that makes me too woke or whatever.
No-Platform-4242 on
Still gave him £12 million of taxpayer money to pay his victims off. She’s complicit.
Scomosuckseggs on
No no – lets not gloss over the truth – the queen tried to silence her sons’ accusers by paying them off rather than him face the music. This was another example of an elite getting out of their responsibility by throwing money at the problem.
And lets be honest – we spend a fortune of taxpayer’s money on them. So she spent our money to protect her son from facing any sort of repercussion.
They are obviously trying to do their best to save the royal family’s image and the memory of the queen. But history will remember her as protecting a pedophile with other peoples money.
(Guess shes the original welfare queen.)
tom-goddamn-bombadil on
But not to go to prison or be stripped of his enormous privilege or face any sort of real consequence. Punched in the face! If I could atone for my sins by being punched in the face once I’d jump at the fucking chance. Christ it’s happened enough for free already. And I’ve not done anything remotely as evil as raping kids.
jlo1989 on
Nope, absolutely not. Spare me the PR efforts. She knew, they paid to cover it up.
PootMcGroot on
This feels like a panicked leaked story, given how the Queen’s documented protection of Andrew paints her as something of a monster.
Cheap-Rate-8996 on
I’ve seen a lot of people try to excuse the Queen’s actions here. “He’s her son, of course she tried to protect him, that’s what you do for your family”.
Um… no? Not if we’re talking about sexual offences against children! We’re not talking about some petty crime like smoking weed or Internet piracy here. If I did what Andrew did my mum would’ve been the first to frog-march me to the police, and rightfully so.
Agreeable_Falcon1044 on
These stories suggest they found something on their little search that’s a bit stronger than handing trade secrets to an Israeli agent.
Get in early with some PR about the queen knowing it’s right to punish him and being distant and disdainful for any rule breaking by him
PoppedCork on
12 million reasons she is not the nice lady they want you to think she was
_Monsterguy_ on
It’s an endless shame we didn’t join in when the French started treating royals correctly…
Satanicjamnik on
….. And yet, it didn’t stop her from enabling and funding all of his bullshit.
Howthehelldoido on
Ah yes, “Operation make Mumsey look good” is in full force I see.
ArumtheLily on
The Queen clearly knew about Mountbatten, a much more evil scumbag than Andrew, by many orders of magnitude. She also sent poor Charles to stay with him. Doubt he ever forgave her.
Only good bomb the RA ever detonated
anon1mo56 on
This is old new from 2020, there is also that old story that circulated among the palace staff.
That Andrew was rude to a staff member in front of the Queen and she forced him to apologize and when Andrew was going away the Palace staff: murmured “mommy made you apologize”. Instantly he got angry.
All are real stories, the Queen was a polite person, like all palace staff have said so, even that former RPO officier who has been giving interviews.
I mean there was also the time the Queen was rude to some place staff who was blocking her way and she instantly apologized when she realized she was being rude due to being in such a hurry. Good people can raise crap people. I mean that is one of the weakness of Monarchism just look at Marcus Aurelius and Commodus.
RealLunarSlayer on
funny how so many anti-andy news from the royals is coming out all of a sudden
skibbin on
The goal: Ensure the continuation of the royal family when something reputational damaging happens
Elizabeth’s strategy: Don’t talk to the press. Minimise coverage. Hush things up.
Charles strategy: Throw the guilty party under the bus. Make their actions weren’t done in his name. Hopefully deter others.
Personally I think Charles has done the correct moral thing and hope that it is a blueprint he and his heirs will follow.
balalalaika on
I am so happy I didn’t go to see her laying in state. I would feel so stupid now.
Plastic_Library649 on
I find this hard to believe.
He was her favourite by all accounts.
Slapped91 on
I hope that footman is immediately employed as an “advisor” to Downing St.
LeatherAdvantage8250 on
I hope the other members of the royal family see how well-liked she is now that she’s dead
24 Comments
People say a lot of things when they’re upset. Their actions speak a lot louder and when it comes to these two, tens of millions of taxpayer pounds. Make of that what you will.
The briefings to paint Queen Mummy in a good light have begun
Should not have shielded him while she was head of the family
Well, she also saw him as her favourite son and sent him £12 million to help cover up his sexual crimes.
Tactical leak. Fact is mummy protected him her entire life.
I don’t know, mate, if I thought someone deserved to be punched, I wouldn’t contribute millions of pounds towards silencing their victims. Sorry if that makes me too woke or whatever.
Still gave him £12 million of taxpayer money to pay his victims off. She’s complicit.
No no – lets not gloss over the truth – the queen tried to silence her sons’ accusers by paying them off rather than him face the music. This was another example of an elite getting out of their responsibility by throwing money at the problem.
And lets be honest – we spend a fortune of taxpayer’s money on them. So she spent our money to protect her son from facing any sort of repercussion.
They are obviously trying to do their best to save the royal family’s image and the memory of the queen. But history will remember her as protecting a pedophile with other peoples money.
(Guess shes the original welfare queen.)
But not to go to prison or be stripped of his enormous privilege or face any sort of real consequence. Punched in the face! If I could atone for my sins by being punched in the face once I’d jump at the fucking chance. Christ it’s happened enough for free already. And I’ve not done anything remotely as evil as raping kids.
Nope, absolutely not. Spare me the PR efforts. She knew, they paid to cover it up.
This feels like a panicked leaked story, given how the Queen’s documented protection of Andrew paints her as something of a monster.
I’ve seen a lot of people try to excuse the Queen’s actions here. “He’s her son, of course she tried to protect him, that’s what you do for your family”.
Um… no? Not if we’re talking about sexual offences against children! We’re not talking about some petty crime like smoking weed or Internet piracy here. If I did what Andrew did my mum would’ve been the first to frog-march me to the police, and rightfully so.
These stories suggest they found something on their little search that’s a bit stronger than handing trade secrets to an Israeli agent.
Get in early with some PR about the queen knowing it’s right to punish him and being distant and disdainful for any rule breaking by him
12 million reasons she is not the nice lady they want you to think she was
It’s an endless shame we didn’t join in when the French started treating royals correctly…
….. And yet, it didn’t stop her from enabling and funding all of his bullshit.
Ah yes, “Operation make Mumsey look good” is in full force I see.
The Queen clearly knew about Mountbatten, a much more evil scumbag than Andrew, by many orders of magnitude. She also sent poor Charles to stay with him. Doubt he ever forgave her.
Only good bomb the RA ever detonated
This is old new from 2020, there is also that old story that circulated among the palace staff.
That Andrew was rude to a staff member in front of the Queen and she forced him to apologize and when Andrew was going away the Palace staff: murmured “mommy made you apologize”. Instantly he got angry.
All are real stories, the Queen was a polite person, like all palace staff have said so, even that former RPO officier who has been giving interviews.
I mean there was also the time the Queen was rude to some place staff who was blocking her way and she instantly apologized when she realized she was being rude due to being in such a hurry. Good people can raise crap people. I mean that is one of the weakness of Monarchism just look at Marcus Aurelius and Commodus.
funny how so many anti-andy news from the royals is coming out all of a sudden
The goal: Ensure the continuation of the royal family when something reputational damaging happens
Elizabeth’s strategy: Don’t talk to the press. Minimise coverage. Hush things up.
Charles strategy: Throw the guilty party under the bus. Make their actions weren’t done in his name. Hopefully deter others.
Personally I think Charles has done the correct moral thing and hope that it is a blueprint he and his heirs will follow.
I am so happy I didn’t go to see her laying in state. I would feel so stupid now.
I find this hard to believe.
He was her favourite by all accounts.
I hope that footman is immediately employed as an “advisor” to Downing St.
I hope the other members of the royal family see how well-liked she is now that she’s dead