Hey guys, can someone explain to me why the layout of seats numbers in IC normal second class wagons are so weirdly sorted out? like why isn’t it in a logical order? 😅
https://i.redd.it/qqunkv31rglg1.jpeg
Posted by wuukaa
Hey guys, can someone explain to me why the layout of seats numbers in IC normal second class wagons are so weirdly sorted out? like why isn’t it in a logical order? 😅
https://i.redd.it/qqunkv31rglg1.jpeg
Posted by wuukaa
15 Comments
It’s actually logical. Seats with numbers ending with 1,2,5,6 are window seats, 3,4,7,8 are aisle seats.
It goes back to wagons with przedziaÅ‚y (compartments). There the seats are numbered like that 1-8 in eachÂ
With this numbering you can exchange one wagon with other.
Bascially, it’s simulating a compartment carriage. Also, the numbers are set up in a way, that makes the most desirable seats numbered sequentially. Here’s a write-up with illustrations: [https://magazyn.koleo.pl/zasada-numeracji-miejsc-w-wagonie/](https://magazyn.koleo.pl/zasada-numeracji-miejsc-w-wagonie/)
There is somewhat logical order, seats are actually in sets of 3, each group is just made into an “L” shape.
Why is it like this? Probably for the internal system to be consistent between compartment and non-compartment carriages
It’s old way of numbering sits from times when trains consisted of little rooms with 6 sits each. They were numbered 1, 2 (window), 3, 4 (middle), 5, 6 (window). So you knew 41 is room 4 by the window.Â
Latter they added 2 additional seats number 7 and 8, so they put it in middle because everyone knew 1, 2, 5 and 6 are by the window. Then they removed the walls.
I honestly have no idea why they are still using it nowadays.Â
There are yt videos on that but in a nutshell it stems from how compartments were numbered with 6 seats each, 2 rows of 3 facing opposite each other. When expanding to 8 seats (2 rows of 4) and further undividing the compartments in a car, the extra number had to be “squished in”. If you take a look, each group of 8 seats have consecutive numbers with 2 (or 3 in case of cars woth an extra seat for disabled) extra ones squised in between.
It’s an old, predigital era standard, firstly used in compartment coaches. The first digit is the compartment number. The second one is the seat number, but there is also coded whether the seat is located near window, etc.
it’s a consequence of historical system when there were compartments and there were no seat maps on the Internet 🙂
from what I remember:
– each compartment got a number 1, 2, 3, …
– then in each compartment even seats are on the left and odd seats on the right
– then seats ending with 1 and 2 are at the aisle
– by convention seats 5 and 6 are also at the window – this may be confusing for 8 seats compartments but is perfectly logical for 6 seats compartments where seats just go up the further they are from the entrance:
“`
window
5 6
3 4
1 2
aisle
“`
since we don’t want passengers to have to think if the compartments are 6 or 8 seat it was settled that 5 and 6 is ALWAYS at the window. So now we have this monstrosity for 8 seat compartment where 7 and 8 was added before 5 and 6 to ensure that passenger buying seat 5 and 6 sits at the window regardless of whether compartment is 6 or 8 seat:
“`
window
5 6
7 8
3 4
1 2
aisle
“`
but now it’s still not the seat layout you see! Why?
see how 3 and 4 are opposite to each other? Again history – in the past these were not sold over the computer but seats where simply sold one by one. Filling in 8 seat compartment was relatively rare, most of the time some seats were empty.
People would usually start with seats 5 6 (window), then 1 2 (aisle), then next seat would be 3 and the next one 4. Looking at the diagram above it doesn’t make sense to sell 3 and 4 but keep 7 and 8 empty – 2 people now sit opposite to each other and 2 empty spaces sit opposite to each other. Better to shuffle this so that 3 is not opposite to 4 – this maximizes the chances that someone sits opposite of an empty seat and therefore has a lot of space to stretch legs. So we end up with:
“`
window
5 6
7 4
3 8
1 2
aisle
“`
now these were directly translated to modern trains even though they no longer have compartments – but it makes it easier to be consistent and well, everyone are already used to this numbering so passangers still expect 5 and 6 to be at the window, 1 and 2 to at the aisle and at that point what’s the point in shuffling back the middle seats.
Recently they sold me a seat that did not exist. I needed to talk to the train manager. He was aware of this issue happening sometimes. Printed me a new one for free. Did not exist either. Only worked on next attempt. Cost me too much irritation because it was a night train and all I wanted was to get on the train and go to sleep.
I ride about 10.000 km by train a year (all IC) and I am also confued by their numbering system
This is some ancient method of numbering seats back when there were compartments.
No sane person ever remembers it, but since PKP itself is like a huge, mossy, mouldy block of concrete that has a problem with anything being all so slightly modern or ergonomic, and hardcore train lovers somehow decipher it, its kept as is.
Just like with other tardy moves such as standing for 1 hour during DST time change, cause apparently filling out timetables would’ve been too hard or complicated.
If you see PKP, basically think “*what would the kaiser Franz Joseph do?*” and go with the flow or logic… The more absurd the easier the PKP will be to understand.
This is like a at least EU-wide system. It’s actually very smart, if you have seat 15 then it means it’s in 1st compartment, by window. Cause numbering starts from walkaways, and then opposite seat. And if you have compartmentless cart, then it’s translated to virtual compartments
This system is properly f****d up and all these explanations “iT’s vErY lOgIcAl” make no sense either.
Its international standard made by Union Internationale des Chemins, norm No 580 if i remember correctly.
Thanks to that pattern is the same in many countries and they can sell ticket for trains from other countries and railway operators. Actually its pretty smart and it contains a lot of informations in these 2 numbers.
My girlfriend tried booking a train, she doesn’t speak polish and for some reason the website didn’t feel like translating that day, it was certainly something.