Share.

31 Comments

  1. Multiple specialists have advised against it, as it presents an enormous risk for the tapestry itself, and no measures proposed have seemed enough to guarantee its safe transportation.

    It’s a stupid, political move regarding a priceless artifact.

  2. After exhibit:

    “Alright… Now give it back.”

    Brits with empty hands: “Give what back?”

  3. Are we sure the British are developed enough to take care of their artefacts? It’s safer if the French museums just take care of these artefacts for them /s

  4. Unrelated, are the rooms behind the advertising billboard inhabited? I can’t imagine people wanting/being allowed to live in windowless rooms. Unless they’re businesses/storefronts with artificial lighting.

  5. Yeah, they are going to damage it for this stupid show.

    It is 1000 year old embroidery with number of repairs done to it through the centuries. Also extremely large and heavy and frail.

    EDIT: Ok, downvote me, I am still 100% correct.

  6. postcard_addict on

    The UK can exchange the tapestry for the Elgin Marbles. Everyone should be happy with that.

  7. Independent-Ad6865 on

    Can someone more knowledgeable in this matter than me explain the history and significance of this relic? And what it symbolizes?

  8. GMorningSweetPea on

    I saw it two summers ago on a trip to Normandy and it is quite a nice museum. I hope as others have said that it isn’t damaged in transport or exhibition, it is such a unique thing to see though. 

  9. Seeing it this big it makes you think why did they not just display it digitally at a larger scale than move the original item in the first place.

  10. Petrosinella94 on

    Reading museum has a version of the tapestry created during the Victorian era. It’s very beautiful to see…