tldr; A crypto whale mistakenly sent 126,000 TON ($165,000) to a scammer due to an address poisoning attack on The Open Network (TON). The scammer created a wallet address resembling the victim’s and inserted it into the transaction history via a small dust transaction. The victim copied the fake address and transferred funds. In a rare move, the scammer returned 116,000 TON ($153,000) while keeping 10,000 TON ($13,000). The incident highlights the growing risk of address poisoning scams in the crypto ecosystem.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Settowin on
Good boy.
czarchastic on
Dude doesn’t want the media attention that comes with being a big-money scammer.
GBeastETH on
That’s not theft. That’s TUITION.
all_smyles on
So was the mistake (complacency?) as in not confirming the address was digit per digit correct??
5 Comments
tldr; A crypto whale mistakenly sent 126,000 TON ($165,000) to a scammer due to an address poisoning attack on The Open Network (TON). The scammer created a wallet address resembling the victim’s and inserted it into the transaction history via a small dust transaction. The victim copied the fake address and transferred funds. In a rare move, the scammer returned 116,000 TON ($153,000) while keeping 10,000 TON ($13,000). The incident highlights the growing risk of address poisoning scams in the crypto ecosystem.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Good boy.
Dude doesn’t want the media attention that comes with being a big-money scammer.
That’s not theft. That’s TUITION.
So was the mistake (complacency?) as in not confirming the address was digit per digit correct??