Share.

9 Comments

  1. ElongatedAustralian on

    I thought the purpose of satire was to exaggerate for comedic effect. Where is the lie?

  2. Unable_Explorer8277 on

    Underestimated their numbers? Or forgot that their husbands can’t tell them which way to vote?

  3. WontThinkStraight on

    >He said the post-mortem had been an eye-opener for many within the party. “Sussan Ley is a woman, obviously, we knew that. And we knew about Jenny And The Girls, of course. And there’s that annoying girl who didn’t smile when she met Scott Morrison on Australia Day – she is one too. But we didn’t expect them to be quite so prevalent across the country. They’re everywhere!”

    >He said it wasn’t the party’s fault that they had totally miscalculated the number of women. “I just wish they’d made themselves more known, made some more noise. Had they done that we could’ve got Peter to dress up as a woman and do some ironing or cleaning for the cameras, to make them feel more included”.

    This is too real.

  4. Sounds about right before I noticed the satire tag.
    > The party says it will act immediately on the findings of the report, just as soon as Kathy on the front desk has typed it up.

  5. The US has a movement to strip the vote from women. They couch it as a “Household vote.” When you ask who decides the household, they say “the head of the household of course.” Which they then quietly say they mean the man.