
Speaking during procedural objections, the defendant’s lawyer, Ali Rıza Dizdar, argued that some parts of the memorandum prepared by the court were written by artificial intelligence.
Lawyer Dizdar was among the complainants in the memorandum of conduct. "Public Law" A person named reacted by saying that it was written. Dizdar, "Who is this son of Kamu, born in 1980, named Public Law? Is this person in the lounge right now? With this memorandum of consent, you decided to continue the detention of 106 people. Did artificial intelligence make this decision too?" he said.
Chairman of the 1st Panel of the Istanbul 40th High Criminal Court, "I don’t even know how to use artificial intelligence" he replied.
The President of the Court rejected the requests of the defendants, who have been detained for 351 days, to reject the judge’s request, on the grounds that “it was aimed at prolonging the trial”.
İmamoğlu’s lawyers Hasan Fehmi Demir and Fikret İlkiz requested the recusal of the judge on the grounds that ‘the court has lost its independence and impartiality’.
İlkiz said to the court panel, “You did not give us the list of defendants at the hearing. You said, ‘We hung it on the door, go and take a photo of it.’ I don’t think you said that to the prosecutor’s office. We do not trust you in terms of moderation.”
Fatih Keleş’s lawyer also requested a recusal.
Keleş’s lawyer, Baran Kaya, said:
“We learned from some media outlets about the memorandum in which you announced the trial day and did not release anyone.
This situation gives us the impression that your court acts as an investigation commission together with the prosecutor’s office. This is not compatible with impartiality.
We demand recusal. We reject your delegation.”
Before the hearing, it was reported in the press that only 25 journalists would be allowed into the courtroom.
İmamoğlu’s lawyer, Fikret İlkiz, brought this up at the hearing and reacted to the court panel:
“I don’t know, will you decide how many journalists to hire? Journalists have the right to make news, just like the public has the right to receive news.
You put the journalists in the corner, at the very end of the hall. “You want the face of anyone being judged here not to be seen.”
Lawyer Akın Atalay said:
“When we investigated the president and three other members of the court, we came across the following picture.
Two members started their career as judges in May 2024. Their professional experience has not even exceeded two years. They have 1.5 years of experience when they are appointed. The other senior member has seven years of professional seniority.
You are the only first-class judge, you have also transitioned from the profession of lawyer to judge, and your time in that profession has allowed you to do so.
Legitimate and justified expectations were not taken into account between experience and the gravity of the case. Under these circumstances, I first request that you withdraw from this case, or if this is not the case, I request a dismissal.”
Buğra Gökçe’s lawyer, Aynur Tuncel Yazgan, said, “Documents regarding the transactions that the defendant should know about cannot be hidden from the defendant and his lawyers. However, we still see that the prosecution has not started and continued properly. For example, I have not seen the MASAK report until this date. My client is detained according to the expert report; but there is no MASAK report.”
Yazgan said that it is clear how the trial will begin and that the decision to accept the indictment must be read in order for the trial to start, and added:
“Is there such an acceptance decision, or was it automatically considered accepted? If you accepted, you need to upload this report to UYAP. I have been a lawyer for 40 years, I have not seen anything like this. I go to the office, there is no proper answer. No attendance was taken. How do you know who is here and who is not? Since you did not make this inquiry, you should not be able to take the next steps.
You want us to continue trusting you as if the identity has been identified and attendance has been taken. However, given the actions taken, I do not accept that the trial has started.
There is an indictment that looks like a kite without a tail. A 3,900-page indictment; However, it reached us with missing pages. Where are the 98 pages? In this indictment, in which a lot of people were suspected, there had to be a list of demands for so many people. You cannot judge for yourself. However, you made a list yourself. On what basis was this listing made? We want to know how you evaluate this indictment. We are here actually and physically. The trial may have started; But this is an unlawful beginning.”
The prosecutor requested that the request for a recusal judge be rejected.
The President of the Court rejected the requests of the defendant’s lawyers for recusal and separation, on the grounds that they were “intended to prolong the hearing”.
https://www.diken.com.tr/ibb-davasi-reddi-hakim-talepleri-reddedildi-imamoglu-kursuye-yurudu/
A jet investigation was launched against Özel due to his words:
"The lawyers rightfully requested the recusal of the judge. Why did they request a recusal judge? Let’s put it very simply.
Firstly, there are 41 high criminal courts in Çağlayan Courthouse. We’ve all known for a year, you all know. When I tell it to all my reporter friends today, they shake their heads. Help foreign correspondent friends as well. It will fall into one of the 41 courts at random, in accordance with our Constitution. And the judge where he falls will see it, in accordance with the principle of natural judge. It has been said for nine months that it will drop to 40. It dropped to 40, right? It fell to the court with a so-called 2.11 percent probability.
The court had one judge and two members. They sent new members to this court. And they appointed three more members next to the judge they wanted. The two of them were here today, in court, on the podium.
It ended up in a court specially arranged by specially appointed chief political prosecutor Akın Gürlek. Two more special judges were placed there and a committee was formed from them. What would you expect now?
Isn’t it probably one of the three or five most important cases in Türkiye’s political history? The case in which the Democratic Party was tried after the coup. Trials after March 12 or September 12… One of the first three trials. What does he want? It takes experience, right? It takes experience.
The judge on the bench today must have passed 10 years to be classified as first class. What does it go through? Two-thirds of his time working as a lawyer is counted. He is such an inexperienced judge.
The other two drew lots in May 2024. They will celebrate their second anniversary this May. Normally, they should be trying to achieve success by gaining seniority and working in a modest courthouse in Anatolia, but they are on the bench in the most important case in Türkiye’s political history. With one year and 10 months of experience.
What would you normally expect here? Experienced, senior judges, high criminal judges. AK Party will arrange it from the youth branches… During this period, in a private interview, ‘What comes to your mind when you think of a chief?’ They brought him here because he was going to say ‘Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’ or there was a judge playing ‘Dombra’ on his mobile phone.
There is a request for a recusal judge. This is the law, it is written like a horseshoe. Open. He says that when a recusal judge is requested, no other work will be done, this will be decided. So that people can object and go to the higher court. Are you going to stop or not? He stalls and delays the rejection of the judge’s request for four hours all afternoon. He asks something else, he asks something else."
https://i.redd.it/6e2ralsnv7og1.jpeg
Posted by EfendiAdam-iki

5 Comments
351 gündür tutuklu adamın avukatına mahkemeyi uzatmaya çalışıyorsun demiş 😀 planlanan azami yargılama süresi 12,5 yıl olan davada
1Ocak doğum tarihi üzerinden bazı çıkarımlar yapılabilir /s
https://preview.redd.it/76nyofuxy7og1.jpeg?width=1265&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5c8dbba558cbf4a053effb6dbf231cd72268b275
Chagpt hesabına bakılmalı eğer chati silmediyse.
“Çetcipiti bana isim üret”
Umarım bu hakimlerin yargılanacakları günler geldiğinde “yeni mezundum, baskı yaptılar, kumpasta rol oynamayı reddetme imkanım yoktu” gibi savunmalar kabul görmez ve göz yaşlarına bakılmaz. İmamoğlu’nun zindanda tutulduğu her bir gün demokratik iradeye ayrı bir tecavüz eylemi olarak görülmelidir.