This a good step forward. I remember when they introduced the age ratings to GTA and call of duty and it stopped them from playing.
PearlsSwine on
That’s lovely, but PEGI ratings don’t stop Gavin from letting his 11 year old play GTA, so I doubt this will do much.
Deliriousious on
Should be 18.
It’s gambling, plain and simple. And if you can’t gamble until you’re 18, then so should loot boxes.
Though when has age ratings ever stopped literally anyone from playing them though. Especially since the digital age has made it laughably easy.
Upstairs-Arachnid-92 on
Just ban them all together gaming was so much better without them it’s just a form of gambling it’s ruined gaming never used to be a thing when I was younger
frappefanatic on
I think loot boxes should just be banned altogether. Like, who the fuck asked for them?
Ghalldachd on
I don’t play many video games anymore but I still hop on Overwatch occasionally and they brought back loot boxes but only as something you can obtain for completing in game challenges. You can’t spend real money on them. Personally, I like this model.
Greymon-Katratzi on
Does anyone take notice of the PEGI rating? No one bothers when GTA gets a BBFC 18 rating and they still buy it for their 12 year old.
WTB7297 on
Good. Hopefully that makes sports games rethink their entire model because I doubt EA would want their biggest franchises in games like FC (FIFA) to have their market diluted by being age restricted.
Cumulus-Crafts on
Honestly, I support it. It is gamified gambling, there’s no reason for kids to have access to it.
Will this stop parents letting their underage kids play these games? No.
metrize on
good remove loot boxes, hope the new york vs valve case has a decisive victory for the state of new york too
HardcoreShadow on
So from within the games industry, this is a big deal for console, PC & mobile developers. Especially games which currently target under 16 year olds.
It means they will now have to make a decision to update their game to remove loot boxes (which can take time to redesign monetisation features) so they can keep the under 16 age rating
OR
Keep loot boxes in their games; but will need to then bump up their age rating for the game. Which will therefore have an impact on their existing target audience going forward
Veinmire on
PEGI 16 is interesting. Don’t know how it is these days, but it used to be that it was kind of a joke age rating, given to pretty tame games like Battlefield and essentially anything in a grey area.
I even remember game stores not taking it that seriously. 18 however was deadly serious.
SmashedWorm64 on
Tbh I was always allowed to play 16s whenever. My parents drew the line at 18.
18 always meant that there was extreme violence or it showed half a tit at some point.
LongCharacter9532 on
I’d almost say real gambling is better than this as there’s at least a chance of getting your money back. With these games it’s one way transactions which inevitably end up being a cash sink for mum & dad, not the kid responsible.
ThrowawayGreekGod on
The rating isn’t to stop children from playing it.
The rating is a warning to parents, and to stop children obtaining it for themselves (when it comes to store bought games).
Astriania on
A good move. An outright ban is perhaps a future step (I believe Belgium has done it, so it can be done) but this is a reasonable balance imo.
A lot of you are saying “but age ratings mean nothing”, but I don’t think you’re right about that. Sure, *some* parents will ignore them and buy 16-rated games for 12 year old Timmy, but a lot won’t, it’s a pretty easy box of “responsible parenting” to tick. So this will apply significant pressure to game devs to not include these features in games they want to sell to younger kids.
Amazing_Strike_5312 on
what is it going to achieve, nothing but looks good on paper.
parents will just do what they do and buy them what they want for an easy life regardless of age and saftey.
Hell they a driving up and down pavements and roads on moterbikes with they’re masks on still in nappies so video games are nothing.
ProperPizza on
A measure that actually protects kids? Rather than the OSA bullshit?
SinisterPixel on
Honestly I’m surprised this doesn’t fall under the simulated gambling guideline revision that PEGI made in 2020
Constantly-baked on
First step, Next step is age verification for these said games.
Glad-Box-7867 on
Cool, another thing that will be either completely ignored or worked around
I do hate loot boxes, cards etc any random element to a transaction, just ban them, you want a skin make it purchasable, you want a card make it grindable or a one off transaction
Pretty simple
Solecis on
Won’t make any difference, stupid parents will continue to expose their kids to crap like this, and eventually it’ll be used as an excuse to require ID and make buying games more difficult for adults.
Escaliat_ on
In that case games with simulated gambling/minigames should be reduced from 18 to 16.
What a fucking garbage system.
KingdomOfPoland on
Hopefully this means less shit teammates in Overwatch
Popular_View_5411 on
are they going to do anything with roblox and its micro transactions and creeps.
Eyemontom on
Will this include pokemon games where you open packs? They are in effect, kinda like loot boxes….
26 Comments
This a good step forward. I remember when they introduced the age ratings to GTA and call of duty and it stopped them from playing.
That’s lovely, but PEGI ratings don’t stop Gavin from letting his 11 year old play GTA, so I doubt this will do much.
Should be 18.
It’s gambling, plain and simple. And if you can’t gamble until you’re 18, then so should loot boxes.
Though when has age ratings ever stopped literally anyone from playing them though. Especially since the digital age has made it laughably easy.
Just ban them all together gaming was so much better without them it’s just a form of gambling it’s ruined gaming never used to be a thing when I was younger
I think loot boxes should just be banned altogether. Like, who the fuck asked for them?
I don’t play many video games anymore but I still hop on Overwatch occasionally and they brought back loot boxes but only as something you can obtain for completing in game challenges. You can’t spend real money on them. Personally, I like this model.
Does anyone take notice of the PEGI rating? No one bothers when GTA gets a BBFC 18 rating and they still buy it for their 12 year old.
Good. Hopefully that makes sports games rethink their entire model because I doubt EA would want their biggest franchises in games like FC (FIFA) to have their market diluted by being age restricted.
Honestly, I support it. It is gamified gambling, there’s no reason for kids to have access to it.
Will this stop parents letting their underage kids play these games? No.
good remove loot boxes, hope the new york vs valve case has a decisive victory for the state of new york too
So from within the games industry, this is a big deal for console, PC & mobile developers. Especially games which currently target under 16 year olds.
It means they will now have to make a decision to update their game to remove loot boxes (which can take time to redesign monetisation features) so they can keep the under 16 age rating
OR
Keep loot boxes in their games; but will need to then bump up their age rating for the game. Which will therefore have an impact on their existing target audience going forward
PEGI 16 is interesting. Don’t know how it is these days, but it used to be that it was kind of a joke age rating, given to pretty tame games like Battlefield and essentially anything in a grey area.
I even remember game stores not taking it that seriously. 18 however was deadly serious.
Tbh I was always allowed to play 16s whenever. My parents drew the line at 18.
18 always meant that there was extreme violence or it showed half a tit at some point.
I’d almost say real gambling is better than this as there’s at least a chance of getting your money back. With these games it’s one way transactions which inevitably end up being a cash sink for mum & dad, not the kid responsible.
The rating isn’t to stop children from playing it.
The rating is a warning to parents, and to stop children obtaining it for themselves (when it comes to store bought games).
A good move. An outright ban is perhaps a future step (I believe Belgium has done it, so it can be done) but this is a reasonable balance imo.
A lot of you are saying “but age ratings mean nothing”, but I don’t think you’re right about that. Sure, *some* parents will ignore them and buy 16-rated games for 12 year old Timmy, but a lot won’t, it’s a pretty easy box of “responsible parenting” to tick. So this will apply significant pressure to game devs to not include these features in games they want to sell to younger kids.
what is it going to achieve, nothing but looks good on paper.
parents will just do what they do and buy them what they want for an easy life regardless of age and saftey.
Hell they a driving up and down pavements and roads on moterbikes with they’re masks on still in nappies so video games are nothing.
A measure that actually protects kids? Rather than the OSA bullshit?
Honestly I’m surprised this doesn’t fall under the simulated gambling guideline revision that PEGI made in 2020
First step, Next step is age verification for these said games.
Cool, another thing that will be either completely ignored or worked around
I do hate loot boxes, cards etc any random element to a transaction, just ban them, you want a skin make it purchasable, you want a card make it grindable or a one off transaction
Pretty simple
Won’t make any difference, stupid parents will continue to expose their kids to crap like this, and eventually it’ll be used as an excuse to require ID and make buying games more difficult for adults.
In that case games with simulated gambling/minigames should be reduced from 18 to 16.
What a fucking garbage system.
Hopefully this means less shit teammates in Overwatch
are they going to do anything with roblox and its micro transactions and creeps.
Will this include pokemon games where you open packs? They are in effect, kinda like loot boxes….