All in all, this is a logical consequence of the interpretation of Article 18 of the Constitution, as previously applied by the Supreme Administrative Court, and of the court’s application of EU law.
And actually, I’d really like to hear exactly how recognising civil acts relating to same-sex marriage constitutes an attack on the family. Because, as we all know, first it’s men with other men, and then it’s ghettos for straight people /s
Different_Citron_160 on
Right wingers so obsessed with homosexuals
pierdola91 on
PiS destroyed the constitution and now wants to talk about “not constitutional.”
3 Comments
All in all, this is a logical consequence of the interpretation of Article 18 of the Constitution, as previously applied by the Supreme Administrative Court, and of the court’s application of EU law.
And actually, I’d really like to hear exactly how recognising civil acts relating to same-sex marriage constitutes an attack on the family. Because, as we all know, first it’s men with other men, and then it’s ghettos for straight people /s
Right wingers so obsessed with homosexuals
PiS destroyed the constitution and now wants to talk about “not constitutional.”
Ok, pal.