Is this a problem? If so, why? Isn’t .co.uk just more popular than .uk because of the fact it is more familiar to people and people want those domains more? If a company wanted a .co.uk domain that was already in use, they could either pay for it if they thought it was worth it, or just buy the .uk domain which might be avaiable and cheaper. Simple supply & demand – what’s the issue?
geeoharee on
Nobody wants .uk, it’s been .co.uk since the beginning for us. I see a lot of numbers but I don’t see why it should worry me that nobody uses .uk?
I also see a shit-ton of em dashes but apparently we’re no longer allowed to complain about that.
zubeye on
It was a dilemma for a couple of years, but it’s largely settled now. We let our .UK domains expire. nobody has registered them.
Temp89 on
Overstating it a bit by calling it a dilemma…
.co.uk is the accepted domain to the extent .uk can be seen as dodgy.
srirachaninja on
What was the reason to do the [co.uk](http://co.uk) in the first place? Seems so unnecessary
sjintje on
I thought that was Ukraine.
Indie_uk on
What is the dilemma? Nobody from the UK would ever care beyond .edu.uk or .gov.uk type ones
carl84 on
Technically neither .uk or .co.uk are correct, per the standard it should be .gb
_terminal_velocity_ on
There’s something about .uk that just feel worse. I don’t like it. It feels like it should be Ukraine. .co.uk will always have better branding in my opinion.
double-you on
Why did they even open the direct .uk registry? Because it seems like a complete scam: “hey, we opened this registry just so you have to get a domain in this one as well to avoid problems”.
13 Comments
honestly didnt even realise just .uk was a thing
Don’t do Serbia or it skews the statistics
Is this a problem? If so, why? Isn’t .co.uk just more popular than .uk because of the fact it is more familiar to people and people want those domains more? If a company wanted a .co.uk domain that was already in use, they could either pay for it if they thought it was worth it, or just buy the .uk domain which might be avaiable and cheaper. Simple supply & demand – what’s the issue?
Nobody wants .uk, it’s been .co.uk since the beginning for us. I see a lot of numbers but I don’t see why it should worry me that nobody uses .uk?
I also see a shit-ton of em dashes but apparently we’re no longer allowed to complain about that.
It was a dilemma for a couple of years, but it’s largely settled now. We let our .UK domains expire. nobody has registered them.
Overstating it a bit by calling it a dilemma…
.co.uk is the accepted domain to the extent .uk can be seen as dodgy.
What was the reason to do the [co.uk](http://co.uk) in the first place? Seems so unnecessary
I thought that was Ukraine.
What is the dilemma? Nobody from the UK would ever care beyond .edu.uk or .gov.uk type ones
Technically neither .uk or .co.uk are correct, per the standard it should be .gb
There’s something about .uk that just feel worse. I don’t like it. It feels like it should be Ukraine. .co.uk will always have better branding in my opinion.
Why did they even open the direct .uk registry? Because it seems like a complete scam: “hey, we opened this registry just so you have to get a domain in this one as well to avoid problems”.
.co.uk just sounds better idk