Canadians aren’t sold on the hype that is AI, since what we have right now isn’t AI and it’s getting called that. Much the same way as HOVERBOARDS were a thing a decade ago, even though they didn’t hover.
Ov3rReadKn1ght0wl on
It’s kind of hard to be sold on the hype of thing whose only basis for hype is the sheer amount of investor cash thrown at it as opposed to any tangible benefits the thing provides. If anything, AI proves to be more a detriment than a boon especially when we factor in how resource intensive the support infrastructure for it is. Canadian skepticism is highly justified in this case.
AlbertanSays5716 on
We’ve yet to see any demonstration that they significantly improve either the country or the province. They can have a significant impact on resources – mostly power and water – but provide very few long term jobs and little in terms of government revenues. The pitch so far seems to be “This stuff is cool, and diversifies your economy”, which is not entirely true.
jonlmbs on
Reliance on this technology is coming whether we like it or not – so we might as well own the hardware and have some sovereign control of it.
SA_22C on
Who cares if Canadians are ‘sold’ on it or not? They’re going to be built regardless.
The fatal AI beatings will continue until moral improves.
PigeonsOnYourBalcony on
Regardless of how you feel about AI, I haven’t seen a single instance of data centres being a net positive for any community it’s in.
You might get some short-term benefits if they hire people within the community to build it but it’s going to drain all your water and drive up the price of your electricity indefinitely.
TheLoveBoat on
It isn’t clear what the detractors want here.
Don’t build data centres in Canada? Ok, they will be built elsewhere. Then Canadians will be even more dependent on technology and infrastructure outside our borders (which have much less access to clean energy I might add).
All this talk about AI hype cycles and bubbles is irrelevant. As long as environmental impact is minimal and consumer energy prices don’t spike, there’s no reason the government should dictate what private companies invest in.
If you read between the lines, what anti-data centre people want is to block people from using AI. Which isn’t possible or desirable. People are going to use AI and companies are going to invest in AI. We just have to decide if we’re going to participate or sit on the sidelines.
rustysnyper81 on
I encourage everyone to watch the “Data Centre” episode by More Perfect Union. There are significant quality-of-life issues associated with building data centres near housing, not to mention the devastating impact on rural communities where land values can triple, forcing farmers out.
There’s definitely a case to be made that we’re in an AI bubble, and it’s going to burst when people realize the promises made are decades away. The cost of data centres will far outweigh any current benefits.
8 Comments
Canadians aren’t sold on the hype that is AI, since what we have right now isn’t AI and it’s getting called that. Much the same way as HOVERBOARDS were a thing a decade ago, even though they didn’t hover.
It’s kind of hard to be sold on the hype of thing whose only basis for hype is the sheer amount of investor cash thrown at it as opposed to any tangible benefits the thing provides. If anything, AI proves to be more a detriment than a boon especially when we factor in how resource intensive the support infrastructure for it is. Canadian skepticism is highly justified in this case.
We’ve yet to see any demonstration that they significantly improve either the country or the province. They can have a significant impact on resources – mostly power and water – but provide very few long term jobs and little in terms of government revenues. The pitch so far seems to be “This stuff is cool, and diversifies your economy”, which is not entirely true.
Reliance on this technology is coming whether we like it or not – so we might as well own the hardware and have some sovereign control of it.
Who cares if Canadians are ‘sold’ on it or not? They’re going to be built regardless.
The fatal AI beatings will continue until moral improves.
Regardless of how you feel about AI, I haven’t seen a single instance of data centres being a net positive for any community it’s in.
You might get some short-term benefits if they hire people within the community to build it but it’s going to drain all your water and drive up the price of your electricity indefinitely.
It isn’t clear what the detractors want here.
Don’t build data centres in Canada? Ok, they will be built elsewhere. Then Canadians will be even more dependent on technology and infrastructure outside our borders (which have much less access to clean energy I might add).
All this talk about AI hype cycles and bubbles is irrelevant. As long as environmental impact is minimal and consumer energy prices don’t spike, there’s no reason the government should dictate what private companies invest in.
If you read between the lines, what anti-data centre people want is to block people from using AI. Which isn’t possible or desirable. People are going to use AI and companies are going to invest in AI. We just have to decide if we’re going to participate or sit on the sidelines.
I encourage everyone to watch the “Data Centre” episode by More Perfect Union. There are significant quality-of-life issues associated with building data centres near housing, not to mention the devastating impact on rural communities where land values can triple, forcing farmers out.
There’s definitely a case to be made that we’re in an AI bubble, and it’s going to burst when people realize the promises made are decades away. The cost of data centres will far outweigh any current benefits.