First one doesnt look like the regular FPVs which are directly human controlled. More like the Lancet type where you select a target and it tracks it.
reallycoolIRL on
The first two clips in this video depict strikes from an Almas NLOS ATGM being mislabeled as “drones.”
Afghanman26 on
If these are tandem warhead and too slow for trophy then that’s a wrap.
Tullzterrr on
FPV really changed everything, to think Ukraine produces approximately 8 million per month, Russia is truly fcked
bruceki on
drones are the new close air support, and the go-to for assumetric warfare. drones level the playing field between infantry and armor, particularly because they are so cheap. i expect there to be hundreds of thousands of drones in every future conflict. With 3d printers the manufacturing base for drones can be a very small footprint.
spin0 on
Where did the first targeted vehicle disappear? @0:20 it is being targeted and purportedly hit @0:35, yet it’s not there @0:45 when the other nearby vehicle is targeted.
That first vehicle should have been right there at the scene burning off if it really was hit. But no. No smoldering wreckage, no soldiers escaping, nothing. The first vehicle simply disappears from the scene without a trace.
And then the second one looks like zooming into a picture instead of drone flying to a target.
The third one however looks like actual drone footage. Yet as there’s no aftermath footage we don’t know what happened to the tank.
Gman90sKid on
Third one gave up on the softest part of the mk3, the rear door, just to go for the thickest armor on the turrent.
LolaBaraba on
The title is inaccurate. The first two are the Iranian copy of the Spike missile called Almas. You can see the APS on the armored vehicle, which probably intercepted the missile, considering the armored vehicle is no longer there in the second video. I’m guessing the same outcome for the tank. The third one is an FPV, but it hits the turret, which is the strongest part of the tank. I’ve never seen an FPV drone with a tandem warhead, so i assume that tank is fine as well. But it shows the danger of drones who can fly slowly to avoid APS detection (although i don’t see an APS on that tank).
8 Comments
First one doesnt look like the regular FPVs which are directly human controlled. More like the Lancet type where you select a target and it tracks it.
The first two clips in this video depict strikes from an Almas NLOS ATGM being mislabeled as “drones.”
If these are tandem warhead and too slow for trophy then that’s a wrap.
FPV really changed everything, to think Ukraine produces approximately 8 million per month, Russia is truly fcked
drones are the new close air support, and the go-to for assumetric warfare. drones level the playing field between infantry and armor, particularly because they are so cheap. i expect there to be hundreds of thousands of drones in every future conflict. With 3d printers the manufacturing base for drones can be a very small footprint.
Where did the first targeted vehicle disappear? @0:20 it is being targeted and purportedly hit @0:35, yet it’s not there @0:45 when the other nearby vehicle is targeted.
That first vehicle should have been right there at the scene burning off if it really was hit. But no. No smoldering wreckage, no soldiers escaping, nothing. The first vehicle simply disappears from the scene without a trace.
And then the second one looks like zooming into a picture instead of drone flying to a target.
The third one however looks like actual drone footage. Yet as there’s no aftermath footage we don’t know what happened to the tank.
Third one gave up on the softest part of the mk3, the rear door, just to go for the thickest armor on the turrent.
The title is inaccurate. The first two are the Iranian copy of the Spike missile called Almas. You can see the APS on the armored vehicle, which probably intercepted the missile, considering the armored vehicle is no longer there in the second video. I’m guessing the same outcome for the tank. The third one is an FPV, but it hits the turret, which is the strongest part of the tank. I’ve never seen an FPV drone with a tandem warhead, so i assume that tank is fine as well. But it shows the danger of drones who can fly slowly to avoid APS detection (although i don’t see an APS on that tank).