In the priest’s disks, as Goniec.pl reveals, among the usual photos from school trips, materials depicting abused children were found. We are talking about rape of minors under 10 years of age. One-year-old children may also be among the victims. "He was merciless in what he did," we read about Father Grzegorz O.

It was August 2022. It was then that heinous acts related to Father Grzegorz O., who had been working with children for years, began to come to light. For a long time, he built his position in the school environment — in 2020 he was promoted from deputy headmaster of a high school in Wrocław to the headmaster of a primary school in Lubin. Both schools were run by clergymen.

Investigation into the case of a priest from Lubin. The identities of the victims have not been established

Today, it is not certain when exactly the crimes began. However, it is known that the way the priest acted shocked the investigators. The priest was supposed to contact people with similar inclinations.

What was found on the priest’s disks? In one of the cases, a situation involving a girl was recorded, whose fate remains unknown to this day. Her identity has never been established. Like many other children appearing in the secured materials — both those from school photos and those who may have fallen victim to crimes. Some of the files were described with Polish names.

The most shocking thread concerns the girl in the June 2022 video. The search lasted for almost three years — until May 2025. Eventually, the investigation in this part was discontinued. The reporter Gońca.pl obtained many transcripts of conversations from this investigation. One of them read:

Similar records of terrifying conversations with minors are published by goniec.pl. One concerns communication via instant messenger. The priest was allegedly under the influence of amphetamines at the time. He was also alleged to have drugged his victim.

The case is also highly controversial due to the actions of the justice system.

By September 2023, Grzegorz O. had been convicted, had already left the penitentiary and was considered a rehabilitated person.

However, the verdicts were passed without full knowledge of the scale of the seized materials and without the opinions of experts in the field of sexology or psychiatry.