Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A fractured, avant-garde painting captures the complex legal battle over holding the fossil fuel industry accountable for climate change.San Francisco TodayIn a coordinated effort, Republican-led state legislatures are passing legislation to shield oil and gas companies from legal accountability for their role in climate change. This push to provide legal immunity for the fossil fuel industry has sparked intense debate and raises questions about the balance of power between state and federal institutions, as well as the future of environmental accountability in the United States.
Why it matters
With 15 laws either enacted or under consideration in 11 states, this coordinated strategy threatens to undermine long-standing legal mechanisms for holding corporations accountable for the costs of climate-related disasters and environmental degradation. The stakes are high, as these bills aim to block ongoing and future lawsuits by states, counties, and municipalities seeking to hold fossil fuel companies responsible.
The details
The strategy behind these bills was laid bare during a panel discussion at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) summit, where participants, including Will Hild and Oramel H. Skinner, presented pre-written legislation and funding, indicating a well-organized effort. Hild and Skinner’s organizations, Consumers’ Research and the Alliance for Consumers, are funded by entities connected to influential conservative activist Leonard Leo, who advocates for legal immunity for companies in climate-related cases.
- In 2026, Republican-led state legislatures began passing bills to shield oil and gas companies from climate change lawsuits.
- The strategy behind these bills was discussed at an American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) summit in 2026.
An influential conservative activist who is linked to the coordinated effort to pass legislation shielding oil and gas companies from climate change lawsuits.
A participant in the ALEC summit panel discussion who presented pre-written legislation and funding for the bills aimed at providing legal immunity for oil and gas companies.
A participant in the ALEC summit panel discussion who presented pre-written legislation and funding for the bills aimed at providing legal immunity for oil and gas companies.
An organization funded by entities connected to Leonard Leo that advocates for legal immunity for companies in climate-related cases.
An organization funded by entities connected to Leonard Leo that advocates for legal immunity for companies in climate-related cases.
What’s next
The legal battles over these bills are intensifying, with high-profile cases like the one in Boulder, Colorado, where local governments are suing oil companies for environmental damage. The involvement of Leonard Leo’s network, including lobbying firms and dark money groups, adds a layer of complexity to the issue. The introduction of similar bills in multiple states and the potential for state-by-state conflicts underscore the broader implications of this legal battle, which could ultimately be resolved by the Supreme Court or Congress.
This coordinated effort by conservative groups to shield oil and gas companies from climate change liability through state legislation raises serious concerns about the future of environmental accountability and the balance of power between state and federal institutions. The stakes are high, as these bills threaten to undermine long-standing legal mechanisms for holding corporations responsible for their role in the climate crisis.