*”Skin biopsies were also collected before and after grape consumption from both UV-exposed and unexposed skin.*
*Although more than one hundred skin samples were collected, many failed RNA sequencing quality checks.*
*Complete usable data came from only four women, all with the same skin type and all originally classified as non-responders because their redness threshold had not improved.”*
Lol what? Their whole study is based off of samples from 4 women…
Cristiano1 on
“The first clue came from measurements of malondialdehyde, a marker linked with oxidative stress and cell membrane damage after UV exposure.
Across the larger participant group, malondialdehyde levels dropped significantly after grape consumption.
Even the four apparent non-responders showed reduced oxidative damage.”
Sellazard on
Yeah. Saw the sourceand it has conflict of interest
Funded by California Grape Commission.
I dont understand why this sub even allows such articles
REXIS_AGECKO on
Everything is a “superfood”
ecafsub on
First time hearing a scientist use the term “superfood,” since there is no such thing.
YourGuyK on
Superfood is a marketing term, not a scientific one. It’s meaningless.
GoodWhoops on
In mice
CarlJH on
No, they don’t say that at all. Scientists NEVER say that. ‘Superfood’ is not a scientific term. Journalists say shit like that.
YonYonYonYonYon on
“Superfood” is not a real thing and you should be suspicious of anyone using that term.
MisanthropicAtheist on
Scientists definitely aren’t saying that sinc3 “superfood” is a mai I guess marketing term.
naughtyamoeba on
It’s a shame that they are sprayed so heavily then.
11 Comments
*”Skin biopsies were also collected before and after grape consumption from both UV-exposed and unexposed skin.*
*Although more than one hundred skin samples were collected, many failed RNA sequencing quality checks.*
*Complete usable data came from only four women, all with the same skin type and all originally classified as non-responders because their redness threshold had not improved.”*
Lol what? Their whole study is based off of samples from 4 women…
“The first clue came from measurements of malondialdehyde, a marker linked with oxidative stress and cell membrane damage after UV exposure.
Across the larger participant group, malondialdehyde levels dropped significantly after grape consumption.
Even the four apparent non-responders showed reduced oxidative damage.”
Yeah. Saw the sourceand it has conflict of interest
Funded by California Grape Commission.
I dont understand why this sub even allows such articles
Everything is a “superfood”
First time hearing a scientist use the term “superfood,” since there is no such thing.
Superfood is a marketing term, not a scientific one. It’s meaningless.
In mice
No, they don’t say that at all. Scientists NEVER say that. ‘Superfood’ is not a scientific term. Journalists say shit like that.
“Superfood” is not a real thing and you should be suspicious of anyone using that term.
Scientists definitely aren’t saying that sinc3 “superfood” is a mai I guess marketing term.
It’s a shame that they are sprayed so heavily then.