Share.

    6 Comments

    1. Acceptable_Aside_568 on

      Well, in their strikes on Moscow Ukrainians hit civilian buildings. It’s a line russians never had any problems crossing but I don’t believe that’s an example to follow. Ukraine made good progress without it and attacking civilian targets is counterproductive in the long run.

    2. Under_Over_Thinker on

      Russian anti air is worse and more scarce than it used to be. They can’t import high-precision tech and that’s why their missiles miss their targets.

      Also, Russia has no qualms with throwing Ukrainian drones off their course with EW into residential areas.

      There is little sense for Ukraine to target civilians in Russia. There is neither military nor political gains from it.

    3. “*Therefore Ukraine must be very careful: understanding its tactical goals in the war it is waging, it should defend the territories of NATO countries”*

      *Is he on drugs?*

    4. DarkIlluminator on

      Militants on both sides shot down/jam drones/missiles over apartment blocks to protect military/strategic targets from precise strikes.

      Also, both sides (at least both Ukrainians and separatists, not sure about Russians) were reported by Amnesty International to fire artillery from civilian areas which resulted in counterbattery fire killing/maiming civilians (that’s how “bombing Donbas” worked).

      That war has really opened my eyes to how despicable militants as a class are.