the Swiss flag and the EU flag

    In late 2024, Switzerland and the EU concluded negotiations on a new comprehensive package of bilateral agreements (known as Bilaterals III). Ultimately, the fate of these accords will be decided by Swiss voters in a referendum

    Keystone-SDA

    The package of bilateral agreements being finalised between Switzerland and the EU must be anchored in the Federal Constitution through a transitional provision, a parliamentary committee says.

    +Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox

    The House of Representatives’ Committee of Political Institutions backs a proposal from a parallel Senate committee that calls for approval by a double majority of Swiss voters and cantons.

    The lower chamber committee backed the proposal by 15 votes to 10, parliamentary services announced on Friday. Submitting the Swiss-EU agreement package to both voters and the cantons is “justified by its importance and constitutional nature”.

    At the same time, the committee believes a simpler solution could be a “sui generis” one-of-a-kind referendum. By 16 votes to 9, it has asked for this option to be examined in greater detail.

    More

    ursula von der leyen and viola amherd

    More

    Swiss Politics

    The Swiss-EU bilateral treaty updates, explained

    This content was published on

    Jan 29, 2025

    Switzerland has negotiated a new agreement with the EU, marking a new chapter in the history of a complex relationship. What is set to change?

    Read more: The Swiss-EU bilateral treaty updates, explained

    A minority of parliamentarians opposes the proposal, arguing that a constitutional amendment would prevent the Swiss-EU agreements and their implementing legislation from being put to a single vote. This could jeopardise the overall compromise — for example on wage protection — and thus endanger Bilaterales III as a whole.

    The proposal seeks to resolve uncertainties over the constitutionality of amending the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons. According to the Senate committee, a contradiction exists between extending free movement and the constitutional provision on the autonomous management of immigration.

    More

    Bilateral agreement signed by Guy Parmelin and Ursula von der Leyen

    More

    Swiss diplomacy

    Switzerland, EU sign package of agreements to strengthen ties

    This content was published on

    Mar 2, 2026

    Swiss President Guy Parmelin and the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, signed a package of accords in Brussels on Monday designed to strengthen bilateral relations.

    Read more: Switzerland, EU sign package of agreements to strengthen ties

    The new transitional provision would allow the approval of the agreement package despite constitutional rules limiting immigration. It would also settle the question of whether a double majority of the people and the cantons is required.

    The proposal further stipulates that, in the event of a conflict between the agreements and either the Constitution or federal law, the Federal Court must apply Swiss law if the legislator has expressly rejected the agreements. This is intended to preserve sufficient national leeway to act accordingly and to accept the consequences under international law.

    Views of legal scholars

    The Senate committee heard from Stefan G. Schmid, professor of constitutional law at the University of St Gallen, at the end of March. He highlighted the constitutional tension created by extending free movement, which confers new residence rights.

    More

    This year, the 720 parliamentarians will have to vote on the Switzerland-EU agreements, but most of them have not yet paid much attention to them.

    More

    Swiss Politics

    Swiss-EU accords have more support in Strasbourg than in Bern

    This content was published on

    Jan 24, 2026

    In the European Parliament, a new package of agreements between Bern and Brussels is seen as cementing an essential partnership in the face of geopolitical tensions.

    Read more: Swiss-EU accords have more support in Strasbourg than in Bern

    While the Federal Council argued that the quantitative impact would be limited, Andreas Glaser, professor of public and administrative law at the University of Zurich, countered that the key issue is not the numbers but the legal ability to control them.

    Schmid described a transitional provision as “legally feasible but politically difficult”.

    Translated from French by AI/sb

    How we work

    We select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools to translate them into English. A journalist then reviews the translation for clarity and accuracy before publication.  

    Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. The news stories we select have been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team from news agencies such as Bloomberg or Keystone.

    If you have any questions about how we work, write to us at english@swissinfo.ch

    Articles in this story

    Share.

    Comments are closed.