Share.

    31 Comments

    1. Rigolol2021 on

      The standard issue with this kind of map is that it uses the administrative borders of the city, instead of the shape of the actual urban sprawl, which would make much more sense

    2. No-Brief-347 on

      That’s not Oslo though thats the municipality. The city itself is just the 15 districts + city centre

    3. Emotional_Fan239 on

      When I think of Berlin I imagine it much smaller, like Madrid sized

    4. What is the criteria for making the list? There are lots of cities with bigger surface area than listed here… Capitals? Nope… Biggest populations? Nope… EU members? Nope…

    5. Greater London is a recent phenomenon and includes many boroughs that was never considered part of London.

    6. madmonkey23 on

      And Bucharest? Much bigger than Budapest!

      Brother we did the Hungarians dirty, who is the bigger power now. Bucharest power!!!

    7. opinionated-dick on

      This is nonsense. Area as a measure of city size is meaningless.

      By this metric only 6 European capitals would be larger than Leeds

    8. Remarkable_Ad9193 on

      HELSINKI IS BIGGER THAN STOCKHOLM!!!! ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎโ˜๐Ÿปโ˜๐Ÿป๐Ÿ—ฟ

    9. No_Peach2280 on

      Thatโ€™s a map of Greater London which is essentially a county comprising two cities (City of London, and City of Westminster) alongside the 32 boroughs. In the UK, Greater London as pictured is more comparable to a county such as Leicestershire. The actual City of London is the smallest in the UK.

    10. This looks like just the administrative limit for some… and metropolitan for others.

    11. stoutymcstoutface on

      *by area according to semi randomly drawn administrative boundaries*

      Edit: maybe Iโ€™m old but not sure why itโ€™s not in italics above