Government spending 25 times more on benefits than jobs for young people, says Alan Milburn

The immediate cop-out with this is usually about pensions but he’s completely right.

We’ve got an exploding benefits bill for young people out of work that needs to be addressed.

With all due respect to Alan Milburn there are so many NEET young people because the state has catastrophically failed at delivering an economy that can still ladder the young into work.

Also those that are older in gen Z and DO have jobs invariably are being paid at the same entry rate as 20 years ago!

If you’re a IT worker for instance a junior sysadmin for example has to fight for 40k (Recently had an interview where I was told they’d struggle to go over 40k lmao) it’s barely budged for decades!

My personal peeve is working for a boomer boss who tries to lowball employees, not because the work is easy but because they haven’t caught up with what’s decent wages and then whining about how they can’t get any decent talent through the door.

Not sure why that government arent intervening to actually bring the costs of living DOWN.

Energy, food, council tax, housing. All inflationary.

We need to deflate these as paying people more isn’t going to work either.

Boomers looted the property market, now looting the welfare system with the triple lock. There’ll be nothing left of the country by the time they finally die off

Invest in services. Nucleur power plants manufacture, water services,

* **Sovereign SMR Advanced Manufacturing:** Mass-manufacture and run **23 standardized Small Modular Nuclear Reactors** directly on assembly lines using 100% upfront state cash, eliminating private interest to deliver power at pure generation cost.
* **A Municipal Social Housing Trust:** Build millions of state-funded, zero-debt modular homes on publicly owned land, decoupling shelter costs from speculative markets to drop housing outlays to baseline structural maintenance.
* **Automated Public Transit and Water Grids:** Fully nationalize, automate, and electrify the physical rail, bus, and water infrastructure, running them cleanly as zero-profit, state-subsidized logistical utilities to maximize economic velocity.

get the costs to the smallest possible and take the load off. We don’t need to be in a subscription model forever. Even our money systems and energy systems are subscriptions where we never own anything and are forever paying out more and more for diteriating services.

These people are under the false impression that jobs are available. The focus is always on training and / or motivating people to take jobs without the foggiest notion that those jobs don’t actually exist.

Continuing to hand out training and qualifications for jobs that don’t exist is a complete waste of time and money. It’s also soul-destroying for those seeking work. But the government just thinks ‘lets pay for even more training!’ completely tone-deaf to the reality that jobs don’t exist.

There’s a whole industry of training people for jobs that don’t exist and it’s entirely funded by clueless out-of-touch government.

If that ‘training money’ was instead used for real hands-on work, perhaps building affordable housing, then we’d at least have something to show for the money spent, rather than thousands of jobless people with CVs filled with training they’ll never use and nobody wants.

A few years ago, I still remember the (social media) glee of the older generations, booking their holidays abroad, after being first in line for the COVID jabs.

Taking holidays, while we as a nation, made teenagers and young adults miss school, along with important and vital socialising experience, with one another.

Not much gratitude, in the following years, from the older generation, for their children and grandchildren making a large social sacrifice for them

It’s a lot of money that could be spent on public sector jobs to make those sectors better. But then the Dailymail and Telegraph throw a fit and the crabs in a bucket get mad about other people having jobs so it seems they’d rather those people just sitting on benefits doing nothing instead hence why we get public sector jobs cuts.

People in these threads are always so close to hitting the mark.

‘Raaarr we have not enough jobs to get young people into’

‘Might be because theres around 10 million immigrants who also take jobs’

‘Noooo nooo thats racist we need to somehow fit more jobs on this tiny island’

Milburn’s obviously trying to frame this as a spending priority issue, but the real scandal is that young people are being offered the same wages as two decades ago while costs have gone through the roof. You can’t just slash benefits and magically create decent jobs when the economy is structured to keep entry-level pay stagnant and automation is eating up the roles that used to provide a ladder. Honestly, taxing automation and putting that into proper support, whether UBI or actually well-funded training schemes, makes way more sense than blaming the kids for the state’s failure to adapt.

Labour is imo unwilling to really reassess the role of work and companies and the state because it’s stuck in 2006 neoliberal mode. It needs a more solid notion of how to force businesses to be more socially participatory and reinvestment driven rather than financialisation driven. 

We need to protect our futurist businesses from capitalist predation and quarterly returns and get them to reinvest in this country, engineering routes to new jobs via universities and schools. We have high levels of technical and research knowledge and we have good logistics. We can use it to put net benefit if we have the ambition and can learn to disentangle a load of private wealth from decision making.

Alan Millburn was part of the Blairite administration in which this was literally a central pillar of their macroeconomic philosophy.

Instead of full employment, the “third way” was about subsidising demand, markets, and inshallah. These people believe that benefits spending creates a floor for the economy and that ‘the market’ will magically funnel that into the most efficient outcomes (and jobs) for society.

It is this governing science, based on neoclassic assumptions about market efficiency and the limited role of the state, that has created a system of economic planning which simply does not create desirable outcomes over time. It essentially requires the goal of fulfilling the social needs of society to be dependent on the social planning of profit-before-anything corporations and the balance sheets of the big banks.

Now they have identified such issues—indicative that it’s a shit way to organise society—they cry foul. But they still have no real solutions because they are still wedded to every single ideological precept that got us here in the first place, while being truly incapable of Intellectual self reflection…

maybe if they stopped letting companies offshore jobs to india and south africa, there would be good jobs available. wages have collapsed in 14 years. Gen Z have seen their parents & grandparents give up their family life for jobs & still get fucked over.

i’m 50 & in 3 years have seen my career prospects go from thinking about spending £10k on a watch to a year unemployed & becoming king of the yellow stickers.

there is zero chance of having a good job for life now. it’s constantly WE have to retrain, WE have to spend £10,000s & 10,000 of hours on training, WE are expected to “sacrifice for the greater good” & “tighten our belts” as corporations offshore jobs and then bitch and whine that no one is loyal or buying their products.

fuck milburn, fuck the CEOs who want us to starve & bitch about minimum wage being too high & fuck the government who thinks anyone will fight for this shit hole ponzi scheme of a country as it makes life impossible for all but the most criminal wealthy bastards & aristocracy

I’m 39, when I was starting at 16 you’d get the City wide newspaper on a Wednesday (Evening Post for Bris), circle the jobs you liked the look of then phone a few up, by the end of the day you’d have a couple interviews or literal chats – maybe the phone call was enough and you were invited to come for a trial shift and sometimes even a proper shift.

This system did me well right the way from 16 past Uni at 24 when I did a second degree which was entirely paid for by the Govt and gave me a whacking great bursary. My first degree was £1250 a year.

I sound like a bloody Boomer. Ask me how much you could get for a quid in the shop.