Unless it is a joint statement by both nations, I will not believe it to be true.
ComprehensiveKiwi489 on
Also from the NYT article: “*U.S. officials said that the proposal* ***did not settle*** *the issue of precisely how Iran would give up its stockpile, putting off the details for a coming round of talks on Iran’s nuclear program*.”
So, we remove the blockade, and then remove all US troops from the region, and then discuss details of the nuclear issue? Why wouldn’t they just continue to deflect and extend the deadline, if we no longer have any leverage?
5 Comments
Paywall
Let’s wait till the otherside confirms
This dude is constantly juking the market
Unless it is a joint statement by both nations, I will not believe it to be true.
Also from the NYT article: “*U.S. officials said that the proposal* ***did not settle*** *the issue of precisely how Iran would give up its stockpile, putting off the details for a coming round of talks on Iran’s nuclear program*.”
So, we remove the blockade, and then remove all US troops from the region, and then discuss details of the nuclear issue? Why wouldn’t they just continue to deflect and extend the deadline, if we no longer have any leverage?
Pump and dump.