I’ve seen Caucasian Iberia but I never noticed a Caucasian Albania
lendlevtaldrik on
Could put a label on Estonians at least. They weren’t among the *Finnish* tribes and the term “Chudes” was mostly used for more eastern Finnic tribes at this point by Russian chroniclers. And Livonians deserve an honorable mention as well.
AdrianRP on
The kingdom of Galicia wasn’t established until the 10th century and never spanned all of Northwestern Iberia. At this point that territory was called Asturias, which was divided several times into Leon and Galicia, and was reunited and divided several times giving birth to Portugal in the process
rsotnik on
Turkic tribes, not Turkish.
tcsreject on
The Iberian peninsula fumbled hard , they were the pinnacle of civilization until the inquisition
RockThePlazmah on
Cities are wrong. The first mentions about Kraków and Przemyśl are from X century
StoneColdCrazzzy on
Looking at this, I can see the Frankish assumption that they were reestablishing Western Roman Empire next to the Eastern.
Dendec on
When Ireland was free and the Goths shared a country with the Swedes!
BasarMilesTeg on
Easter border is very ambiguous. They were definitely not an integral part of the empire, at most tribute payers.
Bakchod169 on
Golden age of muslims
RoiDrannoc on
In reality, we shouldn’t call it the Frankish empire because such entity never existed.
The Carolingian empire is seen by some historians as the early phase of the Holy Roman Empire, and by the other historians as its predecessor. In both cases, it’s no surprise that it’s more complicated than you think.
The Frankish kingdom and the restaured “Roman Empire” were two different entities with two different titles but with exact same territory.
When the split happened (in 888/922), it was as much a split of territory as a split of titles. The “Roman empire” (HRE) lost the west, and the kingdom of the Franks (France) lost the east.
So yeah, this is a map of both the kingdom of the Franks and the (proto-Holy) Roman Empire, but not of a Frankish empire.
toyyya on
Sweden is painfully wrong lol, firstly calling the Sami people “Finnish tribes” is just incorrect but also and arguably more important the non Sami Norse already were the dominant cultural force much further north than shown on this map.
mattivahtera on
That large “Finnish tribes” is gonna hurt people. 😁
Saikamur on
Well, that “Kingdom of Galicia” can trigger an angry debate. However, my understanding of the consensus is that by the early IX century, Galicia was a county of the Kingdom of Asturias, and it was not established as a Kingdom until at least a century later, with [Ordoño II](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordo%C3%B1o_II_of_Le%C3%B3n).
Atlandios000 on
Wait for how much time did the Eastern Romans held Sardinia ? I thought that it would have been fallen untill then.
Axelxxela on
Every map of Italy:
Pitiful_Coach_314 on
Brought to you by a Bulgarian.
Romeo_y_Cohiba on
Is “kosovo” also in the caucuses but not recognized as independent?
TheProcrastafarian on
Where’s Aachen?
Ant_TKD on
The region of modern day Cymru at this time wouldn’t have been one single territory called “Wales”, but rather a number of distinct kingdoms (Gwynedd, Powys, and Dyfed being the biggest three, but with many more smaller ones).
xCheekyChappie on
Serbia holding on for dear life being squished between three empires
Fantastic_Moment2069 on
Croatia was vassal state for a while, not part of Empire
PetiB on
Rip avar people.
ZeroK_23 on
Was there a place named iberia in the caucasus¿? Why was that? First time hearing it, it seems super curious to me
The_Thermaltaker on
Pretender to the Throne of Rome
SuperiorDraft on
I see Kyiv – but where’s Muscovy?
SavingInfo on
Kyiv, not Kiev
LoboDibujante on
Kingdom of Asturias, not Galicia.
Natural_Public_9049 on
Bohemia and Moravia are wrong, they were tributaries, not integral parts. That came later during HRE after 12th century.
31 Comments
I’ve seen Caucasian Iberia but I never noticed a Caucasian Albania
Could put a label on Estonians at least. They weren’t among the *Finnish* tribes and the term “Chudes” was mostly used for more eastern Finnic tribes at this point by Russian chroniclers. And Livonians deserve an honorable mention as well.
The kingdom of Galicia wasn’t established until the 10th century and never spanned all of Northwestern Iberia. At this point that territory was called Asturias, which was divided several times into Leon and Galicia, and was reunited and divided several times giving birth to Portugal in the process
Turkic tribes, not Turkish.
The Iberian peninsula fumbled hard , they were the pinnacle of civilization until the inquisition
Cities are wrong. The first mentions about Kraków and Przemyśl are from X century
Looking at this, I can see the Frankish assumption that they were reestablishing Western Roman Empire next to the Eastern.
When Ireland was free and the Goths shared a country with the Swedes!
Easter border is very ambiguous. They were definitely not an integral part of the empire, at most tribute payers.
Golden age of muslims
In reality, we shouldn’t call it the Frankish empire because such entity never existed.
The Carolingian empire is seen by some historians as the early phase of the Holy Roman Empire, and by the other historians as its predecessor. In both cases, it’s no surprise that it’s more complicated than you think.
The Frankish kingdom and the restaured “Roman Empire” were two different entities with two different titles but with exact same territory.
When the split happened (in 888/922), it was as much a split of territory as a split of titles. The “Roman empire” (HRE) lost the west, and the kingdom of the Franks (France) lost the east.
So yeah, this is a map of both the kingdom of the Franks and the (proto-Holy) Roman Empire, but not of a Frankish empire.
Sweden is painfully wrong lol, firstly calling the Sami people “Finnish tribes” is just incorrect but also and arguably more important the non Sami Norse already were the dominant cultural force much further north than shown on this map.
That large “Finnish tribes” is gonna hurt people. 😁
Well, that “Kingdom of Galicia” can trigger an angry debate. However, my understanding of the consensus is that by the early IX century, Galicia was a county of the Kingdom of Asturias, and it was not established as a Kingdom until at least a century later, with [Ordoño II](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordo%C3%B1o_II_of_Le%C3%B3n).
Wait for how much time did the Eastern Romans held Sardinia ? I thought that it would have been fallen untill then.
Every map of Italy:
Brought to you by a Bulgarian.
Is “kosovo” also in the caucuses but not recognized as independent?
Where’s Aachen?
The region of modern day Cymru at this time wouldn’t have been one single territory called “Wales”, but rather a number of distinct kingdoms (Gwynedd, Powys, and Dyfed being the biggest three, but with many more smaller ones).
Serbia holding on for dear life being squished between three empires
Croatia was vassal state for a while, not part of Empire
Rip avar people.
Was there a place named iberia in the caucasus¿? Why was that? First time hearing it, it seems super curious to me
Pretender to the Throne of Rome
I see Kyiv – but where’s Muscovy?
Kyiv, not Kiev
Kingdom of Asturias, not Galicia.
Bohemia and Moravia are wrong, they were tributaries, not integral parts. That came later during HRE after 12th century.
Not accurate. Greece was overrun by Slavs,
Crusader Kings’ best starting date