Share.

    18 Comments

    1. Ill-Carpet2964 on

      The driver suffered a seizure. What a horrific incident. Sometimes terrible things happen and there’s no one at fault. Maybe it would have been easier for the parents to accept if they were able to “blame” someone specific.

      Horrible for both parties’ families.

    2. Judge_Dreddful on

      Such a sad story. If the driver had never had a seizure before then how was she to know what was going to happen? If she was previously diagnosed with epilepsy then that is a different matter, but the story doesn’t say that is the case. You can only presume that the CPS would have had access to all of the facts and decided accordingly.

      Those parents will never ever feel like they have got justice or closure. Imagine waving your kids off to school on a sunny morning only to never seem them alive again and no one will ever be held accountable…

    3. I was diagnosed with epilepsy at 14, I chose not to learn to drive. As I understand it you have a driver’s licence you need to be seizure free for at least two years before driving again.

    4. A terrible event for all concerned, two bereaved families and a woman living with a serious medical condition and having to deal with what happened, probably for the rest of her life.

      What remains to be resolved, however, is the part played by the vehicle that she was driving. If she had been driving a Fiesta, say, rather than a car specifically designed to drive over any obstacle things might have been different. Is that the sort of thing that the coroner takes into account? 

    5. Hopefully the leads to school play grounds being protected from small to medium sized vehicles.

      Bollards on the pavement might have helped a lot?

    6. limeflavoured on

      In the end the right result. She should never drive again, though (although I don’t think that should be a legal ban, beyond the minimum for having a seizure)

    7. Clean-One-2903 on

      Get these over powered huge cars off the city and town streets. Tax them out of existence.

    8. Horace__goes__skiing on

      I hope the arseholes who, at the time solely focused on the make of the car, are ashamed.

    9. The seizure wasn’t her fault.

      Driving that oversized car is. And it is worth pointing out the problem.

    10. WednesdayManiac on

      Ehh as angry as I am that’s fair. However I have questions. Will she lose her license for few years at least to make sure she doesn’t have more seizures?

    11. PM-ME-YOUR-DIGIMON on

      Wonder how they know she had a seizure. When my partner started having seizures the dr made me describe everything I saw during his seizures and because I didn’t describe it perfectly to how he thought seizures were he called me a liar.

    12. Tragic incident where literally no one is declared at fault.

      /R/UK usually bunch: time to push my agenda

      Fucking hell just let things be and feel sorry for all involved who have had one of the most extreme bad luck events happen to them without trying to find a moral high ground in everything

    13. manuka_miyuki on

      ‘The girls’ families said “justice has neither been done, nor has been seen to be done today”.’

      i don’t really get this, sure this is a major tragedy and i feel so sorry for the families involved, but if the woman didn’t have a pre-existing condition and has never had a seizure before, what can you really do?

      if the woman knew she shouldn’t be on the road and has a history of seizures, then fine, i agree with her being charged in some way, but the article says there’s no evidence of a pre-existing condition or history of seizures, so how would it be fair to arrest or charge someone for something completely out of her control?

      but then again the article is a bit vague here, it says no evidence of ‘suffering a similar seizure’, so did she go through something before despite not being diagnosed, or what? it doesn’t seem to be super clear.

    14. Ein_Esel_Lese_Nie on

      Not that I’m searching for blame, though this must be heartbreaking for the parents, but the only cause for the issue here is the vehicle size.

      I much fancy my niece’s chances against a Citroen Ami than a Defender 110. Absolutely no need for these kind of cars in the intrepid rural countryside that is …Wimbledon.

      This accident is one thing, but I’ve even seen entire roads reduced to single track because of these SUVs parking up on the sides. Where we’d once be able to drive up and down normally, we now need to flash the car ahead and give way to one direction at a time.

      Come over to r/ukbike, we love a good moan about Range Rovers believing they’re Morris Minis.

    15. sadfatdragonsays on

      The preventive measure here is not owning massive vehicles, especially in cities where there is 0 reason to have them.

    16. Ein_Esel_Lese_Nie on

      The irony of people justifying these humongous cars for the safety of their own families.

    17. blueblue_electric on

      Keep seeing statements saying the car crashed through the fence, it didn’t.
      There was a news live scene where it clearly showed a fence panel had been removed intact to allow for access, the vehicle had smashed into the metal barrier and flew over.
      I think a lower car like a regular saloon or hatchback would have just smashed into the barrier and stayed there.

    18. Evening-Ad9149 on

      Not sure how I feel over this knowing that if the exact same thing happened to me, I would be prosecuted (I work school transport and there are very strict medical requirements written into contracts in order to do the job), I’m also not sure I buy that someone woke up one day and happened to develop epilepsy at that specific point having never shown any symptoms previously.