Close Menu
    The BBC faces questions over why it did not sack Edwards
    United Kingdom

    The BBC faces questions over why it did not sack Edwards

    Share.
    View 9 Comments

    9 Comments

    1. BobMonkhaus on

      Because everyone said “he’s lovely he’s innocent” and shouted down anyone who dared say otherwise. Well until this week then they suddenly knew all along.

    2. Independent_Tour_988 on

      Presumably because he hadn’t been charged with anything and he had a contract?

    3. Ok-Philosophy4182 on

      Because he hid behind “mental health” pretending he was hospitalised when actually he paid to check into the priory as anyone with money can do.

      The BBC was instrumental in organising this to kill the original story.

      Anyway, the rotten truth is out now – the BBC seemingly loves protecting paedos in its ranks and needs root and stem clean out.

      They literally have a sculpture of a naked child that was made by a paedo on the entrance to broadcasting house ffs. And they’ve just spent more public money to restore it. You couldn’t make this shit up.

    4. dayus9 on

      It sounds like quite dodgy ground for employers to be sacking employees because of arrests.

    7. SoloNo7 on

      You all happy with your license fee being used to protect another paedophile?

      I’m not, that’s why I stopped paying it when the Saville scandal broke.

      Where will you draw the line?

    8. Ok-Philosophy4182 on

      People equivocating need to ask why they are doing so.

      Would they do it if this were Farage or boris ? No fucking chance.

      People are surprisingly open to defending paedos who they like it turns out.

      This is all we know about what he’s done as well, god knows what else he’s done – he was willing to lie to the country through his teeth hiding behind “mental health” when the original story broke to try and save his reputation. History of predators like this will tell us there is much much more we don’t know about.