Share.

    35 Comments

    1. I like how so many people think that there could conceivably be nuclear war “somewhere in the world” like that’s a local event. 

      The more I look at this the more idiotic it is. 

      How is global nuclear war nearly twice as likely as England winning the Ashes, a 50/50 shot that England won multiple time in the previous 20 years?

      Why is Camila so low given it was already largely assumed she’d marry Charles by then and he was definitely going to become King at some point?

    2. Mind-blowing that the % of people believing in the reality of climate change has probably gone *down* even as the evidence has gone up.

    3. Heavy traffic (caused by the roads being clogged by too many people in cars) will deter most people from using their cars?

      We’re more likely to take holidays to space than beat a team in a sport that we invented and have no obvious predisposed disadvantage at?

      Who were these fools?

    4. We’ve still got another 75 years to go, any -or all – of these things could happen by then.

    5. EdmundTheInsulter on

      If most people are deterred from using cars then there wouldn’t be heavy traffic to deter most people

    6. My_Knee_is_a_Ship on

      The UK will become part of a larger federal Europe.

      😅

      You poor deluded bastards.

    7. Cynical_Classicist on

      Well… we may be heading for another great plague soon enough.

      Another world war? That is looking increasingly likely.

    8. Antique_Loss_1168 on

      RoboCamilla in the year 2100 sounds like a decent Dr Who plot. Bonus points if Charles is trapped in a pocket dimension in her metal trousers*.

      *BBC is never going to approve the obvious version of this.

    9. Thinking that there will be massive climate change, a world war, and a nuclear war, and that people will be richer than their parents?

    10. It’s not quite backwards list but some of the less predicted outcomes have happened while the more hopeful ones like beating cancer seem far off.

      Hasn’t England won the Ashes a couple times for example?

      World hunger is also nit quite eradicate but better than it has ever been

    11. Realdeepsessions on

      What I forgot when I first read this is to occur by the year 2100 , I suspect most people will be richer than there parents at this point and we’re got the years now of slow growth which will lead to a decline in birth rate , and will lightly mean there more jobs and less people , leading to company’s paying more even if stuff goes automated it’s always gonna need people to check stuff.

    12. With 25 years gone, we’ve achieved:

      – Queen Camilla

      – Ashes win

      – Space tourism

      We’re well on the way to achieving:

      – Global universal literacy ([currently 87%, up from 80% at the year 2000](https://ourworldindata.org/literacy))

      – Anthropic climate change as an existential threat, likely leading to

      – Nuclear war, which may well become

      – World War Three (though I know that WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones)

      We probably won’t see:

      – Life expectancy hit 100 in the UK, if anything it’s in decline because of

      – Relative poverty of younger people leading to worse health outcomes earlier in life

      – Britain won’t be part of a federal European nation

      – Though the jury is out on Scottish independence

      – Women giving birth at 70 would require spectacular new medical technology

      – As would cures for most forms of cancer

      We definitely won’t see:

      – An end to world hunger. There’s already enough food and we can’t distribute it.

      – A plague that kills billions would end the world as we know it. We are much more interconnected now than we were in the 14th century. Like nuclear war, there’s no point living in fear of it.

      – The end of driving.

      – Human cloning.

      – Gender equality among heads of government

      – First contact, unless you count the most elementary radio messages like digits of Pi or the Fibonacci sequence

    13. bruh, people saying it’s more likely for there to be a nuclear war than a world war???

      how deluded, to believe nukes could fly again AT COUNTRIES and not lead to a world war…

      also, damn, people really pessimistic about world hunger for some reason, like why so positive about 70s giving birth by comparison?