TL;DR: The biggest flaw in capitalism isn’t greed—it’s stagnation. Money stops moving, wealth pools at the top, and innovation stalls. Circulative Cooperative Economics (CCE) fixes that by using an expiring currency called Kyx—money that loses value over time, forcing continuous circulation and reinvestment. Everyone receives a baseline income (Universal Base Value – UBV) that’s the only source of new Kyx, removing the fear of unemployment. Together they ensure a dynamic equilibrium. Businesses in CCE don’t have to pay fixed wages; instead, they share revenue. This means lower prices, more resilience, and no forced labor. It also aligns incentives to enable innovation and long-term thinking. Over time, CCE naturally absorbs the old economy, because people will spend Kyx first (it expires otherwise) and keep hoarding their fiat. This system is decentralized, permissionless, and very hard to shut down. Once enough people meet their daily needs with Kyx, capitalism becomes optional. I would like your help to make this a reality.

Read the full manuscript here: CCE Manuscript

The Problem

For thousands of years, we've produced far more than we need—but artificial scarcity keeps us trapped in work we hate, while wealth concentrates at the top. Capitalism once fueled innovation, but now it hoards money and discourages cooperation. Instead of forcing UBI or socialist reforms inside capitalism, we need an economy designed from the ground up for abundance. That's where CCE comes in.

How CCE Works

1. Expiring Currency (Kyx) Ensures Circulation

  • Kyx loses value over time (demurrage), meaning it’s always better to spend or invest it rather than hoard it.
  • This prevents economic stagnation, eliminates passive rent-seeking, and keeps wealth moving.
  • It also ensures that long-term investment beats short-term speculation, flipping capitalist incentives upside down.

2. Universal Base Value (UBV) Replaces Wages and Stimulates Innovation

  • UBV is the only way new money enters the economy, keeping wealth distribution naturally balanced.
  • This removes the fear of unemployment and frees people to innovate, create, and contribute in meaningful ways instead of being forced into meaningless work.
  • It ensures that capital flows bottom-up, instead of top-down in traditional systems.
  • Universal Base Value recognizes that every individual has inherent worth and deserves to participate in the economy. It ensures that cultural and societal contributions are valued.

3. No Fixed Wages – Businesses Share Revenue Instead

  • Instead of paying fixed wages, businesses can operate on revenue-sharing agreements, distributing earnings to all contributors fairly.
  • This keeps labor costs flexible, allowing businesses to offer goods cheaper than capitalist competitors while still ensuring everyone gets their share.
  • The more successful a business is, the more everyone involved benefits, without the need for a single “owner” extracting profit.

4. Parallel Growth: CCE Absorbs the Old System

  • Since Kyx expires and is generally available through UBV, people will spend it before they spend fiat currency.
  • People can still use fiat where necessary (rent, taxes), but over time, most daily needs will be covered by Kyx.
  • As more businesses and services accept Kyx, it naturally absorbs the old economy (by people just continuing to hoard their fiat), without needing a revolution, just participation.

6. Decentralized and Resilient

  • CCE runs on blockchain-based governance with a web-of-trust identity system to prevent fraud while remaining fully decentralized.
  • Since CCE is fully decentralized and opt-in, it doesn’t rely on permission from banks or governments—it simply grows as more people choose to participate.

Why This Would Actually Work

1. The Synergy of UBV, Demurrage & Revenue Sharing.

  • Each piece of CCE fixes the weaknesses of the others.
  • UBV (Universal Base Value) + Demurrage → UBV introduces money, demurrage prevents hoarding, keeping wealth moving.
  • UBV + Revenue Sharing → No need for exploitative wages. Since everyone has a baseline, businesses just share profits instead of paying fixed wages, making goods cheaper.
  • Demurrage + Revenue Sharing → You can’t hoard money, but you can earn continuous revenue by contributing to valuable projects—incentivizing long-term innovation over short-term profit-chasing.
  • This means CCE businesses can outcompete capitalism, offering lower prices, greater resilience, and constant reinvention.

2. Greed Is a Symptom, Not Inherent.

  • People act in their own self-interest; that’s natural. But how self-interest manifests depends on the system.
  • In capitalism, self-interest turns into greed because hoarding and extraction are the best ways to "win."
  • In CCE, self-interest drives collaboration because reinvesting, innovating, and revenue-sharing create the most long-term value.
  • The problem isn’t greed, it’s misaligned incentives. CCE fixes that by ensuring the easiest way to improve your situation is by improving things for everyone.

3. We’ve Already Seen Small-Scale Proofs of Concept.

  • The town of Wörgl, Austria (1932) issued a local currency with demurrage, leading to a rapid increase in employment and infrastructure investment. The national bank shut it down because it was too successful.
  • The Mondragon cooperatives in Spain show that worker-owned businesses compete successfully in a capitalist world when designed correctly.
  • Universal Basic Income experiments prove that people still contribute productively when given a financial safety net, and they often become more entrepreneurial.

4. CCE Offers an Advantage Over Capitalism, Not Just an Alternative.

  • Capitalism’s primary advantage is competition but CCE businesses have lower costs and more financial resilience, so they can provide better prices while still ensuring fair compensation.
  • If people can meet their needs cheaper through Kyx transactions, they will.
  • Once enough industries run on CCE principles, capitalism simply becomes inefficient in comparison.

5. It’s Hard to Stop – And Would Only Get Harder.

  • CCE isn’t something that requires permission. It’s decentralized, opt-in, and open-source.
  • Even if governments don’t like it, it’s no different than any other community currency except that it’s structured to self-reinforce and scale indefinitely.
  • Once it reaches critical mass, it becomes a self-sustaining parallel economy—without a single central authority needing to “run” it.
  • Unlike past experiments, CCE is fully decentralized. No single entity can shut it down, and since it's opt-in, it spreads naturally. Governments don’t need to ‘approve’ it—people just start using it.
  • Transactions happen peer-to-peer, without banks acting as middlemen.
  • Even if governments tried to block it, a global network ensures resilience.

Yes, there are technical and adoption challenges—no illusions here—but I'd rather try and improve the world than just accept it as is.

Why Now?

  • Inflation and economic instability are making fiat less reliable than ever.
  • People already experiment with alternative economies (crypto, co-ops, community currencies)—CCE just unifies these ideas into something practical.
  • AI and automation are killing traditional jobs—instead of fighting that, CCE embraces a post-work reality where people contribute freely without fear.
  • This isn’t about ideology—it’s about fixing what’s broken in the economy with better incentives. The tech now exists to make it work in a decentralized, unstoppable way.
  • As societal instability rises, CCE needs to be proven to work before a new and less desirable equilibrium can be found .

How Do We Make This a Reality?

  • We build the tech. A blockchain-based system for Kyx transactions, revenue-sharing, and UBV distribution.
  • We grow the network. More businesses accepting Kyx means more real-world use cases. Imagine your rent, food, or even internet bills being payable in Kyx.
  • We make it the better option. The more needs Kyx covers, the less people rely on fiat. It’s not a revolution—it’s an evolution.
  • We scale globally. When people see it working, they’ll want in. That’s how systems change—not by force, but by making the old system obsolete.

Who’s Interested in Building This?

I believe Circulative Cooperative Economics can become a real, working parallel economy, not just a thought experiment. The pieces already exist:

  • Demurrage currencies have been tested successfully (before being suppressed).
  • Worker co-ops already work, just not at the scale they should.
  • UBI experiments show people still work and innovate.

What we need is a system that ties all these elements together, makes them self-reinforcing, and provides the tools for communities to adopt it effortlessly. That’s what CCE aims to do.

I want to build this—but I need your help.

  • Developers: Want to help build the Kyx blockchain and transaction system?
  • Designers: UX/UI designers needed to make this system as intuitive as possible.
  • Economists & Thinkers: Help refine the UBV model and governance structures.
  • Content Creators: Spread the word. We need people who can explain, illustrate, and demo CCE in simple ways.

Comment if you’re interested. Let’s talk. If you’re ready to get involved now, DM me.

Read the full manuscript here: CCE Manuscript

Thoughts? Feedback?

Would you use a system like this? What potential problems do you see? What would convince you to try it?

If you could quit your job tomorrow and still have financial security, what would you spend your time doing? Start a business? Travel? Learn a skill?

Let’s discuss.

An Economy That Works for You, Not the Other Way Around
byu/psi0991 inFuturology

Share.

10 Comments

  1. How might Circulative Cooperative Economics (CCE) shape our world over the next few decades as automation, AI, and global uncertainty disrupt traditional financial systems? By tying together an expiring currency (Kyx), universal base value (UBV), and decentralized governance, CCE aims to create a dynamic, post-scarcity economy in which money is always moving and individuals have the freedom to collaborate and innovate without the fear of poverty.

    In the near future, we might see early adopters forming small-scale pilot communities that use Kyx for everyday transactions, testing whether revenue-sharing businesses can truly outcompete capitalist models. Over the longer term, if CCE gains critical mass, fiat and wage-based employment may gradually recede, leading us into a new era of flexible work, broad participation in production, and a global network of community-driven economies.

    In this thread, let’s explore the potential trajectories of CCE as it matures:

    – How early pilot projects might transition from local successes to widespread adoption.

    – Technological challenges (e.g., high-volume blockchain transactions) that must be overcome for large-scale use.

    – The cultural transformations that could emerge if people no longer depend on fixed wages for survival.

    – Implications for global governance especially as CCE crosses national borders.

    – What do you see being as problematic and unclear on how it would work?

    Question: Where do you see CCE heading in the next 1, 5, or even 10-20 years, and what do you think are the biggest catalysts or barriers to its long-term success?

  2. And retirees are reliant on this Universal Basic income which inhibits their ability to save for trips and establish stronger living conditions? The value of this currency will go up and down based on population because of how much is distributed in each period? I’m sorry but this idea seems more like a good creative writing prompt than a workable solution.

  3. Raised_bi_Wolves on

    I don’t think this will be workable when, as you say, due to its parallel nature, you will still need to convert things back into USD, or whatever currency is needed for transactions that have not opted in.

    And then it doesn’t solve the core problem I don’t think? Of greed (or pooling wealth at the top, i.e. greed). Imagining that kyx is the only currency system available to me at the moment. Why wouldn’t I (or a worse actor) try to use AI, or shady business dealings to bring in a LOT of Kyx, then use that to purchase assets like houses, and rent those out for even more Kyx, sharing the revenue with only myself?

    My core problem with all forms of crypto currency, is that they don’t actually fix the issue of hoarding, and it replaces one zero sum game with a super sleek complicated… zero sum game. And currency already sort of expires doesn’t it? Just ask wealthy people, they already don’t hoard cash. They hoard assets and stuff that doesn’t depreciate, whereas I have to spend whatever I can make on filling basic needs.

  4. If your only solution is a currency nobody’ll understand, it’s not really a solution.

    Also a far simpler solution would be a non-corrupt government that defends its citizens economically and enforces ethics on the capitalist system.

  5. Capitalism is a lot of things but it is not stagnant.

    Managed inflation does exactly what this degrading currency system is supposed to do.

    If inflation is reducing the value of your dollar year on year, you’ll spend or invest it. That’s why we don’t stick it in the mattress. This maintains the velocity of money.

    The inflation rate is exactly what the supposed k% would be in this CCE scenario.

    The rest of the article is AI generated junk.

  6. You see, this sounds interesting, but it also seems unrealistic. The claim is that the economy running on Kyx will naturally be superior to capitalism and subsume it over time, but how does this economy come to exist in the first place? You say businesses operating on CCE will be more profitable than traditional capitalist business, but who profits? For an economy to exist, you need supply and demand, buying and selling. Say people jump on board with Kyx, start getting it out of thin air from the UBI, and form the “demand.” Now where is the “supply” expected to come from? Both man-hours and fiat currency would be required to produce resources to exchange with Kyx, but then who would want to do that for currency that can’t do anything except buy their own product and will simply disappear if not spent quickly enough? Sure, hypothetically, if enough people straight up donated value to the system to help it reach critical mass, then maybe it might live up to the dreams. However, the amount of value that would have to be injected with no returns to be seen is immense. And keep in mind, this is all for the sake of a system that _explicitly disadvantages current winners of the capitalist system_. So don’t expect to get wealthy sponsors.

    But, despite all of that, when I was reading this post I was ready to jump on board. I figured, “hey, if it costs me nothing to sign up, then I’d be willing to give it a go.” But then, I reach the end of your post, and see… the system doesn’t even exist yet. This is all just an idyllic dream, and hasn’t even been fully designed or developed yet – which also takes work to do. Look, as much as I’d love to embrace a new economic system that overcomes the failings of capitalism, this ain’t gonna work unless a huge amount of time and money gets flat-out donated to it first – and I just don’t see that happening.

  7. Single_Concert3093 on

    Those who are hoarding wealth are already investing it. It’s not just sitting in a vault somewhere, otherwise inflation would do the wealth distribution for us.

  8. I downloaded the file, I’ll look at it soon.

    It sounds like my own new currency in the next era.

    [The Resource Solution ](https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSUTnKGWjxTaMIqcXZyMsO00e9KEPJqrl1dOUgll7fudJ9kTWZEKvk44F0tyF4hC8_CRnsG89jtNGyZ/pub)

    My currency is Novi, from the Latin for new, while yours is Kyx from the Greek for cycle. Mine is a passing phase though on the way to RBE, but also necessary, Blockchain based, and decentralized.

    Same as you, I’m open to all ideas, and yours seems very valid. Your focus is more on the currency aspect, based on your post. Mine spells out a whole new way of thinking for humans.

    I’m right there with you, perhaps I’m more radical overall.