Rwanda is demanding that the UK pay £50 million for its cancelled deportation scheme in an escalating diplomatic row between the two countries, The Telegraph can reveal.
The Rwandans have sent a formal notification invoicing the Government for the £50 million they originally agreed to forgo when Labour announced it was scrapping the scheme within days of winning the election.
However, the Rwandan government says the UK has still failed to formally terminate the agreement despite scrapping the scheme – allowing them to claim the payment even though not a single migrant has been forcibly deported to the eastern African state.
David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, suspended aid to Rwanda last week and threatened further sanctions over military action by Rwanda-backed group M23 in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
In a statement, Yolande Makolo, the spokesman for the Rwandan government, said the UK had breached the “trust and good faith” between the two countries by its “unjustified punitive measures to coerce Rwanda into compromising our national security”.
She also accused Lord Collins, the UK minister for Africa, of comments that “misled the public, fuelled the DRC propaganda machine and undermined the ongoing African-led peace process”.
“We are therefore now following up on these funds, to which the UK is legally bound,” she said.
It follows a suggestion by Lord Collins that Rwanda had links with the Ugandan Islamic State-linked group ADF, which recently killed 70 people in a church in eastern DRC. His comments were subsequently retracted.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has consistently criticised the Rwanda scheme as a waste of money that cost the taxpayers some £700 million when just four migrants were voluntarily sent to the east African state.
The £700 million included £290 million of payments to Rwanda, the cost of chartering flights that never took off, detaining hundreds of people and then releasing them, as well as paying for more than 1,000 civil servants to work on the scheme.
Under the agreement, the UK had paid £220 million as of February 2024, with three further payments, each of £50 million, to be made in April 2024, 2025 and 2026.
The agreement contained a break clause that the UK could activate at any point without having to make any further payments. The termination would take effect three months after the point of notification, according to the National Audit Office (NAO) which had access to the financial documentation.
It is believed the £50 million now requested by the Rwandans relates to the payment for April 2025. Ms Makolo said: “Rwanda has sent a formal notification to the UK government that we are invoicing for an amount of 50 million pounds from the Migration and Economic Development Program.
“The UK had asked Rwanda to quietly forgo the payment when they could not transfer any more migrants to Rwanda as their formal notification for termination was forthcoming. This request was based on the trust and good faith existing between our two nations. However, the UK has failed to formally terminate the Treaty as agreed.”
Last week Mr Lammy’s department issued a statement demanding a ceasefire in the DRC, saying it was “deeply concerned” by the situation in the country and that there could be no military solution to the conflict.
Mr Lammy indicated there would be a “strong response from the international community” in response to the escalating crisis in DRC and announced a series of sanctions the UK would take until “significant progress” was made.
It included pausing direct bilateral financial to Rwanda, potential new sanction designations, the suspension of future defence training, reviewing export licences for the Rwanda defence force, ceasing attendance at Rwanda-hosted events and limiting trade promotions in the east African state.
The Home Office and Foreign Office have been contacted for comment.
1-randomonium on
Starmer and Lammy are facing enough anger over the capitulation to Mauritius’ ever-growing demands for money in the Chagos deal. I hope they find a way to politely tell the Rwandans to sod off.
CollReg on
So the Rwandan government is not happy with the Foreign Office’s intervention so is now trying to create some mischief?
Grayson81 on
Can the Tory Party and the cunts at the Telegraph and the Spectator pay this bill?
They’re the ones who thought it was worth spending millions of pounds of our money to be needlessly cruel to half a dozen refugees.
After-Dentist-2480 on
I’m sure Rishi Sunak and his family can take care of that bill resulting from his incompetence.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
HyperionSaber on
We’ll just send pritti patel and braverman over to wash dishes till the debt is paid.
edit: And cleverly.
Muted_Lack_1047 on
A half-assed, throway idea that was cooked up to appeal to “red wall” voters during a local council election has ended up costing us 1/4 billion pounds….. much of which has been embezzled.
It would have faded into insignificance if it wasn’t for braverman.
Embarrassing.
Makaveli2020 on
I recently found out about how terribly cruel and evil Rwanda is to its neighbours and it’s sickening to know the Tories were in bed with them.
ItsUs-YouKnow-Us on
Dear Rwanda,
Kindly fuck off.
Kind regards,
United Kingdom.
PositiveLibrary7032 on
Should be taken out of the Conservative coffers. No ifs-no-buts it was their mistake.
ThatGuyMaulicious on
I mean we already invested into it why wouldn’t we just try it for 6 months? If it doesn’t work then cancel it at least we would’ve known.
Bacon_boi87 on
Sop the UK paid £220 million to Rwanda as of Febuary 2024 and only 4 migrants have been sent before it being scrapped?
Is this what corruption looks like?
parkway_parkway on
I don’t know why people were so against the rwanda scheme.
If someone comes from a dangerous country you presumably can’t send them back there.
And so we’d either need a third country to send them to, or they stay here.
That’s what is happening. The acceptance rates for refugees from Afghanistan, Syria, Eritrea, Libya etc is over 99%.
What do people want? A different third country? Or is it that people like the takeshis castle immigration system where if you can set foot in the UK you get to stay?
I think it’s really unfair that the old, young, sick and vulnerable are all stuck in camps close to where they started and the young and fit who had thousands of pounds to pay their way across Europe can jump the queue and the borders are fully open to them.
I don’t know why everyone so instinctually said this was a terrible idea and what the alternative was?
Lettuce-Pray2023 on
Send Suella Braverman over as an indentured servant – she can work off the debt
Elegant_Rice_8751 on
It was working as Migrant numbers did decrease to the UK and rose to Ireland but was far too expensive
GbJagsfan on
Forward the bill to ‘The Eurosceptics group, C/O Tory Party HQ, London’
Previous_Recipe4275 on
They’ve seen the government cave in to Mauritius over the Chagos, I don’t blame them for having a grab for some cash too
BalianofReddit on
“No”
Haven’t you got a military incursion in Congo to be handling?
Own-Nefariousness-79 on
Johnson, Sunak, Patel, Braverman owe this, £12.5m each seems appropriate.
Rulweylan on
In all fairness to Rwanda, they built the facilities, paid the staff etc.
No reason they should be left holding the bag because our government ordered something stupid. If you put your toddler in charge of ordering dinner and 40 ice cream sundaes turn up at your door, you don’t get to renege on payment because you’ve decided it was a bad idea after all.
AdrianFish on
Cool, send the bill to dear Rishi. You’ll probably find him in the US
MedicineLongjumping2 on
The UKs version of building a wall next to Mexico. Honestly pathetic waste of money by the conservative government.
RoryLuukas on
Compared to the amount the Tories spent on that whole charade £50m is a fecking bargain to be done with it all lol.
Geostationary_Orbit on
Ask the stupid fuckers who came up with the stupid idea to foot the bill.
selina_hebe_ella on
If Rwanda want £50m from us, then they can take a load of illegal migrants too – that sounds fair!
26 Comments
(Article)
—
Rwanda is demanding that the UK pay £50 million for its cancelled deportation scheme in an escalating diplomatic row between the two countries, The Telegraph can reveal.
The Rwandans have sent a formal notification invoicing the Government for the £50 million they originally agreed to forgo when Labour announced it was scrapping the scheme within days of winning the election.
However, the Rwandan government says the UK has still failed to formally terminate the agreement despite scrapping the scheme – allowing them to claim the payment even though not a single migrant has been forcibly deported to the eastern African state.
David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, suspended aid to Rwanda last week and threatened further sanctions over military action by Rwanda-backed group M23 in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
In a statement, Yolande Makolo, the spokesman for the Rwandan government, said the UK had breached the “trust and good faith” between the two countries by its “unjustified punitive measures to coerce Rwanda into compromising our national security”.
She also accused Lord Collins, the UK minister for Africa, of comments that “misled the public, fuelled the DRC propaganda machine and undermined the ongoing African-led peace process”.
“We are therefore now following up on these funds, to which the UK is legally bound,” she said.
It follows a suggestion by Lord Collins that Rwanda had links with the Ugandan Islamic State-linked group ADF, which recently killed 70 people in a church in eastern DRC. His comments were subsequently retracted.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has consistently criticised the Rwanda scheme as a waste of money that cost the taxpayers some £700 million when just four migrants were voluntarily sent to the east African state.
The £700 million included £290 million of payments to Rwanda, the cost of chartering flights that never took off, detaining hundreds of people and then releasing them, as well as paying for more than 1,000 civil servants to work on the scheme.
Under the agreement, the UK had paid £220 million as of February 2024, with three further payments, each of £50 million, to be made in April 2024, 2025 and 2026.
The agreement contained a break clause that the UK could activate at any point without having to make any further payments. The termination would take effect three months after the point of notification, according to the National Audit Office (NAO) which had access to the financial documentation.
It is believed the £50 million now requested by the Rwandans relates to the payment for April 2025. Ms Makolo said: “Rwanda has sent a formal notification to the UK government that we are invoicing for an amount of 50 million pounds from the Migration and Economic Development Program.
“The UK had asked Rwanda to quietly forgo the payment when they could not transfer any more migrants to Rwanda as their formal notification for termination was forthcoming. This request was based on the trust and good faith existing between our two nations. However, the UK has failed to formally terminate the Treaty as agreed.”
Last week Mr Lammy’s department issued a statement demanding a ceasefire in the DRC, saying it was “deeply concerned” by the situation in the country and that there could be no military solution to the conflict.
Mr Lammy indicated there would be a “strong response from the international community” in response to the escalating crisis in DRC and announced a series of sanctions the UK would take until “significant progress” was made.
It included pausing direct bilateral financial to Rwanda, potential new sanction designations, the suspension of future defence training, reviewing export licences for the Rwanda defence force, ceasing attendance at Rwanda-hosted events and limiting trade promotions in the east African state.
The Home Office and Foreign Office have been contacted for comment.
Starmer and Lammy are facing enough anger over the capitulation to Mauritius’ ever-growing demands for money in the Chagos deal. I hope they find a way to politely tell the Rwandans to sod off.
So the Rwandan government is not happy with the Foreign Office’s intervention so is now trying to create some mischief?
Can the Tory Party and the cunts at the Telegraph and the Spectator pay this bill?
They’re the ones who thought it was worth spending millions of pounds of our money to be needlessly cruel to half a dozen refugees.
I’m sure Rishi Sunak and his family can take care of that bill resulting from his incompetence.
[deleted]
We’ll just send pritti patel and braverman over to wash dishes till the debt is paid.
edit: And cleverly.
A half-assed, throway idea that was cooked up to appeal to “red wall” voters during a local council election has ended up costing us 1/4 billion pounds….. much of which has been embezzled.
It would have faded into insignificance if it wasn’t for braverman.
Embarrassing.
I recently found out about how terribly cruel and evil Rwanda is to its neighbours and it’s sickening to know the Tories were in bed with them.
Dear Rwanda,
Kindly fuck off.
Kind regards,
United Kingdom.
Should be taken out of the Conservative coffers. No ifs-no-buts it was their mistake.
I mean we already invested into it why wouldn’t we just try it for 6 months? If it doesn’t work then cancel it at least we would’ve known.
Sop the UK paid £220 million to Rwanda as of Febuary 2024 and only 4 migrants have been sent before it being scrapped?
Is this what corruption looks like?
I don’t know why people were so against the rwanda scheme.
If someone comes from a dangerous country you presumably can’t send them back there.
And so we’d either need a third country to send them to, or they stay here.
That’s what is happening. The acceptance rates for refugees from Afghanistan, Syria, Eritrea, Libya etc is over 99%.
What do people want? A different third country? Or is it that people like the takeshis castle immigration system where if you can set foot in the UK you get to stay?
I think it’s really unfair that the old, young, sick and vulnerable are all stuck in camps close to where they started and the young and fit who had thousands of pounds to pay their way across Europe can jump the queue and the borders are fully open to them.
I don’t know why everyone so instinctually said this was a terrible idea and what the alternative was?
Send Suella Braverman over as an indentured servant – she can work off the debt
It was working as Migrant numbers did decrease to the UK and rose to Ireland but was far too expensive
Forward the bill to ‘The Eurosceptics group, C/O Tory Party HQ, London’
They’ve seen the government cave in to Mauritius over the Chagos, I don’t blame them for having a grab for some cash too
“No”
Haven’t you got a military incursion in Congo to be handling?
Johnson, Sunak, Patel, Braverman owe this, £12.5m each seems appropriate.
In all fairness to Rwanda, they built the facilities, paid the staff etc.
No reason they should be left holding the bag because our government ordered something stupid. If you put your toddler in charge of ordering dinner and 40 ice cream sundaes turn up at your door, you don’t get to renege on payment because you’ve decided it was a bad idea after all.
Cool, send the bill to dear Rishi. You’ll probably find him in the US
The UKs version of building a wall next to Mexico. Honestly pathetic waste of money by the conservative government.
Compared to the amount the Tories spent on that whole charade £50m is a fecking bargain to be done with it all lol.
Ask the stupid fuckers who came up with the stupid idea to foot the bill.
If Rwanda want £50m from us, then they can take a load of illegal migrants too – that sounds fair!