Share.

13 Comments

  1. PM_ME_POLITICAL_GOSS on

    Not sure over time is the right description, and 2016’s title is obscured.

    But interesting tidbit

  2. This should be a bar chart, not be a line graph, as it doesn’t show a continuous change over time. The lines between the dots mean nothing.

  3. eh i think imdb user ratings are kinda off, i prefer letterboxd but i can see why one would use imdb (its more popular)

  4. SyrupyMolassesMMM on

    Huh, TIL the shape or water won an oscar….i actually love that movie…

  5. ThatSmokyBeat on

    This is interesting data I suppose but a bad chart choice. Line charts are useful for interpolation, which makes no sense here. Is there a trend? Perhaps a better choice would be a scatter plot with a trend line and correlation stats, e.g. if the rating is declining or increasing over time.

  6. JimBowen0306 on

    Crash gets a lot of hate (a lot of which is justified), but it’s innocuously placed here.

  7. Were these the IMDb ratings at the time of winning the Oscar, or are they all as of today?

  8. theangryfurlong on

    Crazy that even considering its high rating, LotR:RotK is considered by many to be the weakest in the trilogy.

    Absolute god-tier movie trilogy.

  9. pizzapizzamesohungry on

    After looking at this I realize I don’t fucking give a shit about IMDB ratings.