[OC] The Economist’s Democracy Index has released scores for 2024, these are maps showing the overall score by country, the scores for the Index’s five categories by country, and the change in overall score since 2023.
[OC] The Economist’s Democracy Index has released scores for 2024, these are maps showing the overall score by country, the scores for the Index’s five categories by country, and the change in overall score since 2023.
The [Economist Democracy Index](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index) is a democracy index made by the [Economist Intelligence Unit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economist_Intelligence_Unit). It scores countries on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being the most authoritarian and 10 being the most democratic. Scores are assigned through asking experts (and sometimes public opinion surveys in the country) a set of 60 questions in 5 different categories (electoral process and pluralism, functioning of government, political participation, political culture, civil liberties). Each answer is converted to a number between 0 and 1, then all the answers in one category are added together, then it’s multiplied by 10, and then divided by the number of questions in the category. This produces a score for each of the 5 categories and then the average of these 5 categories is used for the overall score.
Criticisms of the Economist Democracy Index include a lack of transparency on who exactly these experts are, as it is unspecified what kind of experts there are, where these experts are from, and whether the experts are employed by the Economist or not. It has also been accused of having a bias in favor of Western interests, ranking Western nations & their allies higher and their opponents lower than they should be.
Aleph_NULL__ on
these maps are as ugly as they are meaningless.
rotoenforco on
Yikes. The oceans are really authoritative.
PacquiaoFreeHousing on
Props to New Zealand, Norway and Ireland for being dark blue on every single one of them.
Odd-Scientist-9439 on
the economist just asks a few dudes what they think about each country. That’s why west good, east bad (except for western-aligned countries of course.
skurvecchio on
Afghanistan and Burma worse than North Korea?
sonofbaal_tbc on
im guessing this is less about free speach and more about direct and indirect representation
keeptrackoftime on
You can tell how bad these are just by looking at how they rank Japan, a country that, while developed, has been a 1-party state almost without interruption since WW2. Its intra-party politics are more important than elections, and the LDP is supported by wildly egregious gerrymandering and pork barrel projects that essentially lock it into power forever. Opponents sometimes win as unstable coalitions that immediately fall apart, but don’t pose any serious challenge to the LDP’s continual dominance. Yet it’s supposedly more democratic than France by a serious margin.
Deweydc18 on
The civil liberties score is somewhat ridiculous with respect to China. I mean, it’s not perfect, but it’s FAR from “worse than Iraq, same as North Korea and Afghanistan”-tier.
unity1814 on
Full offense at the US rating higher in political participation than Australia. Australia has mandatory voting, it’s a twenty minute errand on a Saturday and they put on a sausage sizzle so you can get a snack on the way out. A third of those dipshits in America didn’t even bother to vote.
Zagrebian on
Romania, an EU country, is not a democracy but a “hybrid regime”.
CurrentYesterday8363 on
Rating the US any type of democracy while it’s being run by a dictator who has publicly proclaimed himself as such is, ah, a choice.
12 Comments
Source is [The Economist’s Democracy Index report](https://image.b.economist.com/lib/fe8d13727c61047f7c/m/1/609fbc8d-4724-440d-b827-2c7b7300353d.pdf?utm_campaign=MA00001514&utm_medium=email-owned&utm_source=eiu-marketing-cloud&RefID=&utm_term=20250226&utm_id=2064759&sfmc_id=00QWT00000J2uGH2AZ&utm_content=cta-button-1&id_mc=279801853), and the maps were generated through [MapChart](https://www.mapchart.net/).
The [Economist Democracy Index](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index) is a democracy index made by the [Economist Intelligence Unit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economist_Intelligence_Unit). It scores countries on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being the most authoritarian and 10 being the most democratic. Scores are assigned through asking experts (and sometimes public opinion surveys in the country) a set of 60 questions in 5 different categories (electoral process and pluralism, functioning of government, political participation, political culture, civil liberties). Each answer is converted to a number between 0 and 1, then all the answers in one category are added together, then it’s multiplied by 10, and then divided by the number of questions in the category. This produces a score for each of the 5 categories and then the average of these 5 categories is used for the overall score.
Criticisms of the Economist Democracy Index include a lack of transparency on who exactly these experts are, as it is unspecified what kind of experts there are, where these experts are from, and whether the experts are employed by the Economist or not. It has also been accused of having a bias in favor of Western interests, ranking Western nations & their allies higher and their opponents lower than they should be.
these maps are as ugly as they are meaningless.
Yikes. The oceans are really authoritative.
Props to New Zealand, Norway and Ireland for being dark blue on every single one of them.
the economist just asks a few dudes what they think about each country. That’s why west good, east bad (except for western-aligned countries of course.
Afghanistan and Burma worse than North Korea?
im guessing this is less about free speach and more about direct and indirect representation
You can tell how bad these are just by looking at how they rank Japan, a country that, while developed, has been a 1-party state almost without interruption since WW2. Its intra-party politics are more important than elections, and the LDP is supported by wildly egregious gerrymandering and pork barrel projects that essentially lock it into power forever. Opponents sometimes win as unstable coalitions that immediately fall apart, but don’t pose any serious challenge to the LDP’s continual dominance. Yet it’s supposedly more democratic than France by a serious margin.
The civil liberties score is somewhat ridiculous with respect to China. I mean, it’s not perfect, but it’s FAR from “worse than Iraq, same as North Korea and Afghanistan”-tier.
Full offense at the US rating higher in political participation than Australia. Australia has mandatory voting, it’s a twenty minute errand on a Saturday and they put on a sausage sizzle so you can get a snack on the way out. A third of those dipshits in America didn’t even bother to vote.
Romania, an EU country, is not a democracy but a “hybrid regime”.
Rating the US any type of democracy while it’s being run by a dictator who has publicly proclaimed himself as such is, ah, a choice.