Scientists have used gene editing to produce artificial electrical synapses in mice, where they can be targeted to make the animals more sociable or reduce their risk of OCD-like symptoms.
Scientists have used gene editing to produce artificial electrical synapses in mice, where they can be targeted to make the animals more sociable or reduce their risk of OCD-like symptoms.
This is a lab result on mice, so likely still years away from treatments available to humans.
Still, here’s a thought to ponder. If gene editing treatments to make people smarter, kinder, and more sociable were widely available, do you think some people would feel threatened ?
Those traits and others correlate with political persuasions. Some people might argue that the population being smarter, kinder, and more sociable is worse for society, in order to protect their political power base.
Illlogik1 on
No one asked you to do this science, maybe animals depend on traits they evolved in order to survive , right ? How bout we just leave nature to its own observable devices?
EndlessSaeclum on
I am all for making people smarter, but I draw the line at personality. I think you should never interfere with people’s personalities. If there are any issues with someone’s personality, then nurture them to be different. If it is possible to change their personality when they are adults, then let them do that. There is no reason to change it before that.
kingseraph0 on
Tbh I think if they perfect this on humans, they are just gonna make Brave New World real
4 Comments
Submission Statement
This is a lab result on mice, so likely still years away from treatments available to humans.
Still, here’s a thought to ponder. If gene editing treatments to make people smarter, kinder, and more sociable were widely available, do you think some people would feel threatened ?
Those traits and others correlate with political persuasions. Some people might argue that the population being smarter, kinder, and more sociable is worse for society, in order to protect their political power base.
No one asked you to do this science, maybe animals depend on traits they evolved in order to survive , right ? How bout we just leave nature to its own observable devices?
I am all for making people smarter, but I draw the line at personality. I think you should never interfere with people’s personalities. If there are any issues with someone’s personality, then nurture them to be different. If it is possible to change their personality when they are adults, then let them do that. There is no reason to change it before that.
Tbh I think if they perfect this on humans, they are just gonna make Brave New World real