Share.

14 Comments

  1. theatlantic on

    Elon Musk’s fleet of 7,000 satellites, which works to provide space-based internet service to the ground, “dwarfs those of all other private companies and nation-states put together,” Ross Andersen writes. “And almost every week, Musk adds to it, flinging dozens more satellites into the sky.”

    Musk first announced his intention to build a space-based internet, which he would eventually call Starlink, in January 2015. He had plans to settle Mars and maybe other interplanetary destinations, all of which would have to be connected via satellite-based communication. But space internet is already a big business on Earth: Fiber networks can’t reach every point on land, let alone airborne or seaborne vessels. More than 5 million people have already signed up for Starlink, and it is growing rapidly. 

    An expanded version of this system or one like it could one day overtake broadband as the internet’s backbone. Developing countries will likely want to bet that they can skip an expensive broadband build-out and go straight to satellite. “And not just for the internet: Musk recently secured permission from the FCC to offer cellphone service via Starlink too. And he’s doing all this with his current technology,” Andersen continues.

    At times when the people of Myanmar and Sudan learned that the internet had been shut off by their autocratic governments, they turned to Starlink; Ukraine’s soldiers use it to communicate on the front lines. The ability to coordinate action in conflict zones has given Musk “unprecedented geopolitical leverage for a private citizen,” Andersen writes.

    Global political leaders have come to understand that Starlink’s dominance will be hard to dislodge, because SpaceX is so good at making satellites and getting them to space; other companies and governments have struggled to achieve a fraction of Musk’s satellite production and launch pace. 

    “The space internet of the future may become the central way that we communicate with one another, as human beings. Information of every kind, including the most sensitive kinds, will flow through it,” Andersen writes. “Whoever controls it will have a great deal of power over us all.”

    Read more: [https://theatln.tc/OQay7z2F](https://theatln.tc/OQay7z2F)

    — Evan McMurry, senior editor, audience and engagement, *The Atlantic* 

  2. magnusssdad on

    “At times when the people of Myanmar and Sudan learned that their water had been shut off by their autocratic governments, they turned to The guy that built them a well.” This guy sounds like a MONSTER!!!! AGGGHHHHH!!!!

    Enabling cell phone coverage in the least available parts of the world….nooooo. Only multinational cell phone companies can do this…think of the children!!!

  3. Sensitive_Ad_7420 on

    Space internet sucks for gaming making it useless to a lot of people that value a powerful connection.

  4. The same service he promised to the people flooded in NC without internet then it turned out to be a free trial that made them sign up for an uncancelled subscription to access?

    Someone needs to deal with him

  5. Whatever you think about Musk and Starlink, you have to give it to starlink that that are basically without competition for the next decade. Iridium go as second contender is not even on the horizon.

    Unless someone else can reuse rockets on scale and thus reduce the cost per kg in low earth orbit by at least one order of magnitude, it’s pretty much „take it or leave it“. If you live on a farm somewhere in the nowhere, it’s literally the only way to obtain a usable stable internet connection that’s comparatively quite cheap. Wether we like it or not, and that sucks.

  6. So it is just about getting loads of debris in orbit so that there can’t be future competition just based on pure logistics. Seems like the same playbook telecomms have always used. Claim ownership of key space and infrastructure to stifle competition.

  7. brucekeller on

    If you think about it, if Elon really wanted to go full evil, he pretty much has the power as a single individual to stop us from going into space again for another hundred years via some Kessler Syndrome cloud of satellite debris.

  8. He has provided the entire world access to the internet. ( those that want it). Developing stuff quickly. History will write him down as the Henry ford or Einstein of our time. Like him or not.

  9. Power grab? Get your Elon bias outta here

    Every company he has ever been associated with has intentionally or unintentionally been for the betterment of society

    Obviously there’s financial incentive but you can’t blame Elon for that, that’s just capitalism

  10. It’s troubling the the vast majority of LEO satellites are privately owned and control by one man. Nobody should have that power. If we are going to continue to let it be privatized, then at least there should be heavy regulations enacted.

  11. Electrician_PLer on

    Starlink has drastically removed barriers for my work and I really enjoy the service. It’s relatively affordable and makes my job safer and more efficient.

  12. Why is it a power grab any more than any other business that solves a problem well and grows because of it? Why is it alarming?

  13. blazersfan1 on

    I miss seeing a sky full of stars without space debris flying all around. Feels like big brother dystopia, go to the middle of nowhere for some peace and quiet and get reminded of this evil nazi every time when you look to the universe.

  14. bleaucheaunx on

    Just watch the beginning of Wall-E. The thick layer of space junk is obvious.