Share.

43 Comments

  1. socratic-meth on

    > Supermarkets told to cut 100 calories from shoppers’ baskets in new anti-obesity drive

    Sir, don’t you think you have enough chocolate? Go put it back.

  2. Comfortable_Bid_4643 on

    Just encourages further shrinkflation, pay the same price for less food.

  3. “Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: “If everyone who is overweight reduced their calorie intake by around 200 calories a day – the equivalent of a bottle of fizzy drink – obesity would be halved.”

    Does the health secretary not realise that the vast majority of fizzy drinks are basically calorie free now?

  4. No_Chemistry53 on

    How about a push for simple ingredient foods, rather than this low kal nonsense

  5. The government should just build their own MyFitnessPal style app which counts calories, builds structured meal plans, educates and then offers coupons/discounts on healthy food. Make it completely free and force all food/drink manufacturers to provide the data.

  6. deepfriedjobbie on

    Increase VAT on processed foods, high fat foods, junk food and sweets. Decrease VAT on fruit, veg, whole foods and protein.

  7. I’m starting my own drive, for every 100 calories you cut from your baskets I’m buying another bar of chocolate!

  8. ilikebiiiigdicks on

    Yayyy less nutrition for the same (or more money). As if shrinkflation and price gouging hasn’t been rampant the last few years already. Why don’t we just skip ahead to the part where we all subsist on government mandated gruel and be thankful.

  9. I_love_running_89 on

    At some point, we have to let people do their thing and take personal responsibility for managing their health and their weight.

    We are biologically programmed to crave high fat, high sugar, high carb foods.

    In a free market, these items are always going to be readily available. At what point does taxation, and shrinkflation, (that have already been implemented with little to no success), stop being the answer?

    Everyone has known for years that you need to eat lots of fruit and veg, avoid junk food, don’t smoke, so some exercise.

    We also live in a society where convenience is king. People work such long hours, and modern demands are such that people are living their lives too exhausted to be able to prioritise their diet and health.

    Knowledge is not the answer.

    Taxation is not the answer.

    I doubt changing a store layout is the answer, either.

    The only answers lie with drastic, unpalatable / morally compromising options.

    Those being – ban on junk food. Healthcare privatisation.

  10. West_Mail4807 on

    I thought the sugar tax was going to cure all your woes?

    (oh, that’s right, you just have drinks filled with nasty chemicals now)

  11. NoRecipe3350 on

    Actually kinda sucks for those who rely on cheap calories to get our daily needs and aren’t fat. Low calorie foods are not my friend, I’m always a full fat milk kind of guy (and I never get fat)

  12. Grouchy-Papaya-8078 on

    Size of sweets and biscuits will be reduced even further – but of course prices won’t.

  13. How about the government stop policing what people buy/eat, and rather invest in public awareness campaigns **and preventative healthcare**.

    Governments role in what we shop should be limited to preventing harmful stuff being added into our foods.

  14. I encourage you all to read the article before commenting on this one as the headline isn’t really representative of the comment. Good luck with that, I know.

    This is asking supermarkets to report average shopping habits and then develop ways to move that in a more healthy direction. There is very little direct government intervention or mandates involved.

  15. kaizermattias on

    “Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: “If everyone who is overweight reduced their calorie intake by around 200 calories a day – the equivalent of a bottle of fizzy drink – obesity would be halved.”

    I’m going to go out on a limb here and say most obese people are not just going over maintainable calories by 200 kcal a day.

    It would take 3.5 years to lose 5st at 200kcal per day

  16. Artistic_Donut_9561 on

    You can tell it’s bullshit because they are pretending they care about your health. this is yet another price increase/ shrinkflation

  17. No-Future5309 on

    Not even a single bag of walkers crips. This is just going to be another attempt at ripping off shoppers who are already struggling no doubt. 

  18. Thestickleman on

    Or just people should eat less instead of punishing everyone else

    Probably solved

  19. Responsible-Cap-6510 on

    Low salt = high fat or high sugar

    Low sugar = high fat or high salt

    Low fat = high sugar or high salt

    Until we address this, we won’t get far

    You can have tasty food without high sugar, high salt or high fat but manufacturers don’t seem to care

  20. YourKemosabe on

    Dumb af. Food education needs to improve. Stop the fad diets and teach the people about **balanced** diets and caloric intake.

  21. Consult-SR88 on

    I’m having to endure an NHS pre-diabetes course to try & stave off the onset of type2 diabetes. I’m particularly prone due to being south Asian.

    Over the past 3 years my weight has gone up uncontrollably (although I’m not overweight officially) & my diet slowly changed from healthy, fresh food & lots of homemade meals to eating highly processed, unhealthy food.

    The reason for that is squarely on my GP, who took 3 years to diagnose & then treat the symptoms of perimenopause. I was so exhausted for 3 years that I could only manage the bare minimum of “take stuff out of the freezer, put it in the oven, eat off one plate” because both cooking & then doing the dishes was completely physically beyond me by the end of a work day.

    Prior to that, I was a healthy & athletic lady who walked hundreds of miles a year carrying heavy rucksacks up mountains & called it a holiday. By the time I got prescribed HRT I could barely walk up the hill outside my house to the Dr’s.

  22. Midnight7000 on

    Nanny state done to avoid the reality that people will make less healthy choices when they’re depressed and struggling to make ends meet.

  23. Rhinofishdog on

    So very tall people and people doing sport or physical jobs are once again going to get fucked by higher food prices?

    Ready meals are useful for me because I have trouble eating enough and they are easy. But it’s getting ridiculous, eating a 350 calorie “healthy” ready meal that costs £4.5 when I should eat 3300 calories per day.

    Literally makes fast food restaurants the cheaper “easy” alternative. And once you go to mcdonald’s it’s extremely easy to overeat even on 3300 calories – I know I track mine…

  24. I feel like this really depends on how you buy your food – is it 100% from the supermarket, or is some of it from takeaways/restaurants etc? I know people that eat out several times a week – their calories would barely be touched by this policy, but mine (I have allergies, so pretty much all my food is made at home) would be.

    (And their shopping basket would make it look like they eat a LOT less than I do, which isn’t the case). Does seem a tad unfair.

    >Supermarkets will be required to report sales data and those that fail to hit targets could face financial penalties, Nesta suggested.

    It could also push people to more takeaways if they’re getting shamed for buying less healthy stuff in the shops.

    (It looks like calories labelling laws don’t apply to takeaways etc. with less than 250 employees)

  25. Admirable-Savings908 on

    The government could invest in outdoor and indoor leisure spaces where people can exercise and improve their physical health. 

  26. bobblebob100 on

    Im not sure ready meals and meal deals are necessarily the evil that they’re made out to be. Sure they probably arent the healthiest option, but they have been around for decades, and obesity in kids specifically has been a more recent issue

    Back when i was a kid i used to walk to and from school, play football with my friends or climb trees. Basically excerise. Now parents are picking kids up from school who live within walking distance, and kids prefer to stay inside on their PS5

    Even for adults the act of going into the office and walking around has been replaced with going from your bed to living room and not moving most of the day for alot of people

  27. Fuck off anti-obesity. That’s a fucking lie. It’s just a window to open up paying more for less food so they can scrape your wallet even more.

  28. And a big fuck you for making all the drinks full of fucking aspartame rather than sugar.

  29. Fucking good. The amount of shopping trolleys I see without a single veg, only highly processed American shit is way too much

  30. Particular_Treat1262 on

    What is the governments obsession with obesity being tackled in ways to at hurt the consumer?

    You know what would cut obesity rates? Having enough disposable income to choose between the more expensive health brand or the one that makes it bottom line by being more lax with what they throw in their product.

  31. I always find it funny the conversation around this is always around the state in your basket. But zero discussion is had around private companies employing psychologists to sub consciously fuck you into buying shite you don’t need.

    We need such massive reform in this country around the nations national thinking.

    You’ll have people age 73 unironically calling for people to have more self control. As they drink a litre of vodka every weekend, didn’t use seatbelts and were against smoking bans.

  32. EchoMaterial5506 on

    Unpopular opinion but if we really wanted to reduce obesity we should just offer GLP1 agonists such as Ozempic or Mounjaro more freely on the NHS…