Share.

    9 Comments

    1. Is it now that people will stop saying that the current far right is the same as the far left?

      These crazy far right loons are going too far, literally turning into want they keep saying they’re against.

    2. This illustrates how our fourth estate increasingly struggles to meet its responsibility.
      Initial reports spoke of “plowing into the crowd” or “driving into the crowd”, yet the video shows a vehicle moving at walking pace, repeatedly braking and steering to avoid demonstrators.
      Such discrepancies in reporting bring us closer to the standards of sensationalism often criticized abroad. It is concerning.

      Fortunately, we still have public service news.

    3. >Zum Motiv der Autofahrerin oder des Autofahrers wollte sich die Polizei auf Anfrage der Nachrichtenagentur-Keystone-SDA nicht äussern. Zuvor hatte sie angegeben, die Person im Auto sei scheinbar **beim Anblick der Menschenmenge in Panik geraten**.

      Ahh, yes, the panic attack you get when you see a crowd of people and suddenly have to rush through them.

      **Translation:**

      *When asked by the Keystone-SDA news agency, the police declined to comment on the motive of the driver. They had previously stated that the person in the car appeared to have panicked at the sight of the crowd.*

    4. People are quick to call this a right wing action, but said those individuals trying to hurt/kill the SVP politician in Lausanne were not far left and Antifa related.

      This doesnt look planned at all. Unless there is more evidence, this was not an attack, but either a panicattack or stress related. The person should be checked either way of course. But calling the right dangerous because of this is beyond stupid and just ragebaiting or propaganda.

    5. A car drove through that?

      A car?

      All by itself? Really? If so, then this shows that self driving cars shouldn’t be allowed on our streets, when they drive through a demonstration. They can do that in the USA, for all I (don’t) care. But here? No.

      Extremely bad wording in the article. I much rather assume, that somebody was in the car and made it drive through the demonstration.

    6. Lol the audacity to be mad at the police for not acting when last week they were marching to ask the police to stop chasing criminals.
      I guess that if the driver hit a wall because protesters were chasing him they would have been charged for murder?