Share.

26 Comments

  1. andrei_snarkovsky on

    makes sense. Add Washington and Colorado and Florida to the 1990’s group and those are some of the fastest growing states in the country. They are building housing for people to be in.

  2. __-__-___---_-_-_-- on

    Interesting data. I wish the colors were a bit more saturated so it was easier to distinguish them, though. It would also be interesting to see standard deviation.

  3. Interesting. What would be some narratives?

    More/less newer housing being built? More/less older housing being torn down? Something else?

  4. I’m a home inspector in the RTP area of NC and last year the average year built of houses I inspected was 2012. 🤣

  5. Someone should do a pie chart showing the percentage of posts in the last few days that are just maps of the USA.

    😏

  6. Will look better and be more representative of the data if done as a gradient by year. What if a state had a housing initiative in 1959? Decade skews the data from accuracy.

  7. So if you build housing more recently than 70 years ago, you get affordable housing. Who would have thought!

  8. WTF are these colours?  5 choices with only 2 distinct colours.  Wild.

    On behalf of the colour blind, do better.

  9. I live in PA (Pittsburgh), for people that grew up in places like FL and TX, I would think they’d be shocked how old so many of the buildings are here. I moved here from Cleveland OH and it’s a difference even from there. Shit feels and looks ancient.